Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733772›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2023

Inhibitory feedback from the motor circuit gates mechanosensory processing in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Sandeep Kumar, Anuj K Sharma, Andrew Tran, Mochi Liu, Andrew M Leifer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of biosciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandeep KumarPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7181-232X
Anuj K SharmaDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5061-9731
Andrew TranPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0009-4957-6071
Mochi LiuDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Andrew M LeiferPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-5093
Princeton University · US

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Probing Brain-wide Functional Connectivity During BehaviorDP2NS116768 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI LEIFER, ANDREW MICHAEL · 2019 to 2019
$2.4M
NIH HHS P40 OD010440NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS116768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals must integrate sensory cues with their current behavioral context to generate a suitable response. How this integration occurs is poorly understood. Previously, we developed high-throughput methods to probe neural activity in populations of Caenorhabditis elegans and discovered that the animal's mechanosensory processing is rapidly modulated by the animal's locomotion. Specifically, we found that when the worm turns it suppresses its mechanosensory-evoked reversal response. Here, we report that C. elegans use inhibitory feedback from turning-associated neurons to provide this rapid modulation of mechanosensory processing. By performing high-throughput optogenetic perturbations triggered on behavior, we show that turning-associated neurons SAA, RIV, and/or SMB suppress mechanosensory-evoked reversals during turns. We find that activation of the gentle-touch mechanosensory neurons or of any of the interneurons AIZ, RIM, AIB, and AVE during a turn is less likely to evoke a reversal than activation during forward movement. Inhibiting neurons SAA, RIV, and SMB during a turn restores the likelihood with which mechanosensory activation evokes reversals. Separately, activation of premotor interneuron AVA evokes reversals regardless of whether the animal is turning or moving forward. We therefore propose that inhibitory signals from SAA, RIV, and/or SMB gate mechanosensory signals upstream of neuron AVA. We conclude that C. elegans rely on inhibitory feedback from the motor circuit to modulate its response to sensory stimuli on fast timescales. This need for motor signals in sensory processing may explain the ubiquity in many organisms of motor-related neural activity patterns seen across the brain, including in sensory processing areas.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansNeuronsAnimalsFeedbackInterneuronsLocomotion

Identifiers

PMID37733772
PMCPMC10617738
OpenAlexW4386917292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.