ArticlePloS one2023
Prediction of respiratory failure risk in patients with pneumonia in the ICU using ensemble learning models.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Intubation Prediction in Pneumonia Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms.Pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Trends and methods in intensive care unit (ICU) research using machine learning: latent dirichlet allocation (LDA)-based thematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pneumonia: Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction.Current pulmonology reports · 2026Review
- Clinical outcome prediction in pediatric respiratory infections using hybrid feature selection and a genetic algorithm-optimized machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the correlation between DNA methylation and biological age using an interpretable machine learning framework.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop early prediction models for respiratory failure risk in patients with severe pneumonia using four ensemble learning algorithms: LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, and random forest, and to compare the predictive performance of each model. In this study, we used the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) for sample extraction, built a respiratory failure risk prediction model for patients with severe pneumonia based on four ensemble learning algorithms, and developed compact models corresponding to the four complete models to improve clinical practicality. The average area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) of the models on the test sets after ten random divisions of the dataset and the average accuracy at the best threshold were used as the evaluation metrics of the model performance. Finally, feature importance and Shapley additive explanation values were introduced to improve the interpretability of the model. A total of 1676 patients with pneumonia were analyzed in this study, of whom 297 developed respiratory failure one hour after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Both complete and compact CatBoost models had the highest average AUROC (0.858 and 0.857, respectively). The average accuracies at the best threshold were 75.19% and 77.33%, respectively. According to the feature importance bars and summary plot of the predictor variables, activetx (indicates whether the patient received active treatment), standard deviation of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, Glasgow Coma Scale verbal score, age, and minimum oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were important. Compared with other ensemble learning models, the complete and compact CatBoost models have significantly higher average area under the curve values on the 10 randomly divided test sets. Additionally, the standard deviation (SD) of the compact CatBoost model is relatively small (SD:0.050), indicating that the performance of the compact CatBoost model is stable among these four ensemble learning models. The machine learning predictive models built in this study will help in early prediction and intervention of respiratory failure risk in patients with pneumonia in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.