Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733339›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2023

Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location.

Natalia Melnik, Stefan Pollmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia MelnikDepartment of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Stefan PollmannDepartment of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central vision loss is one of the leading causes of visual impairment in the elderly and its frequency is increasing. Without formal training, patients adopt an unaffected region of the retina as a new fixation location, a preferred retinal locus (PRL). However, learning to use the PRL as a reference location for saccades, that is, saccadic re-referencing, is protracted and time-consuming. Recent studies showed that training with visual search tasks can expedite this process. However, visual search can be driven by salient external features - leading to efficient search, or by internal goals, usually leading to inefficient, attention-demanding search. We compared saccadic re-referencing training in the presence of a simulated central scotoma with either an efficient or an inefficient visual search task. Participants had to respond by fixating the target with an experimenter-defined retinal location in the lower visual field. We observed that comparable relative training gains were obtained in both tasks for a number of behavioral parameters, with higher training gains for the trained task, compared to the untrained task. The transfer to the untrained task was only observed for some parameters. Our findings thus confirm and extend previous research showing comparable efficiency for exogenously and endogenously driven visual search tasks for saccadic re-referencing training. Our results also show that transfer of training gains to related tasks may be limited and needs to be tested for saccadic re-referencing-training paradigms to assess its suitability as a training tool for patients.

Indexed as

SaccadesVision, LowAgedHumansLearningRetinaScotoma

Identifiers

PMID37733339
PMCPMC10517419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.