ArticleJournal of vision2023
Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location.
Article in Journal of vision, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- RELAY: Robotic EyeLink AnalYsis of the EyeLink 1000 Using an Artificial Eye.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central vision loss is one of the leading causes of visual impairment in the elderly and its frequency is increasing. Without formal training, patients adopt an unaffected region of the retina as a new fixation location, a preferred retinal locus (PRL). However, learning to use the PRL as a reference location for saccades, that is, saccadic re-referencing, is protracted and time-consuming. Recent studies showed that training with visual search tasks can expedite this process. However, visual search can be driven by salient external features - leading to efficient search, or by internal goals, usually leading to inefficient, attention-demanding search. We compared saccadic re-referencing training in the presence of a simulated central scotoma with either an efficient or an inefficient visual search task. Participants had to respond by fixating the target with an experimenter-defined retinal location in the lower visual field. We observed that comparable relative training gains were obtained in both tasks for a number of behavioral parameters, with higher training gains for the trained task, compared to the untrained task. The transfer to the untrained task was only observed for some parameters. Our findings thus confirm and extend previous research showing comparable efficiency for exogenously and endogenously driven visual search tasks for saccadic re-referencing training. Our results also show that transfer of training gains to related tasks may be limited and needs to be tested for saccadic re-referencing-training paradigms to assess its suitability as a training tool for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.