Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733263›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Determinants of physical activity maintenance and the acceptability of a remote coaching intervention following supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation: a qualitative study.

Anouk T R Weemaes, Judith M Sieben, Milou Beelen, Louisa T M A Mulder, Antoine F Lenssen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anouk T R WeemaesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. anouk.weemaes@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4611-6626
Judith M SiebenDepartment of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5759-3383
Milou BeelenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0065-1167
Louisa T M A MulderDepartment of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5447-9323
Antoine F LenssenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-4452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate perceived determinants of physical activity (PA) maintenance following supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation and the acceptability of a remote coaching intervention during this period.

methodsA phenomenological qualitative study with semi-structured interviews was conducted. Nineteen participants (16 women, 3 men) were recruited from the intervention (n = 12) and control group (n = 7) of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of remote coaching following hospital-based, supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation. Participants in the intervention group received a 6-month remote coaching intervention after completing the exercise program, aimed at stimulating PA maintenance. The interviews were based on the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model of Behaviour (COM-B model) and the framework of acceptability (TFA) and were coded using template analysis.

resultsKey themes regarding determinants of PA maintenance were self-efficacy, PA habits, accountability, physical complaints, and facilities. Remote coaching was perceived acceptable because it stimulated PA maintenance by offering a source of structure and social support and thereby increased accountability. Moreover, it improved confidence to perform PA, leading to increased levels of self-efficacy. The remote nature of the intervention was perceived as convenient by some of the participants, while others would have preferred additional physical appointments.

conclusionsCancer survivors considered remote coaching acceptable to stimulate PA maintenance following supervised rehabilitation. Interventions should focus on increasing accountability, self-efficacy, forming habits, and helping cancer survivors to overcome barriers. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The ability to maintain PA beyond supervised exercise oncology programs depends on many determinants. Remote coaching interventions have potential to target individually relevant determinants following exercise programs in cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsExerciseExercise TherapyMentoringNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSelf EfficacyAcceptabilityBehaviour changeQualitative researchTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37733263
PMCPMC11813816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.