Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733239›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2023

Can variants, reinfection, symptoms and test types affect COVID-19 diagnostic performance? A large-scale retrospective study of AG-RDTs during circulation of Delta and Omicron variants, Czechia, December 2021 to February 2022.

Tomáš Kliegr, Jiří Jarkovský, Helena Jiřincová, Jaroslav Kuchař, Tomáš Karel, David Chudán, Stanislav Vojíř, Michal Zavřel, Ondřej Šanca, Ruth Tachezy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tomáš KliegrDepartment of Information and Knowledge Engineering, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czechia.
Jiří JarkovskýInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia.
Helena JiřincováNational Reference Laboratory for Influenza and Respiratory Viruses, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czechia.
Jaroslav KuchařDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czechia.
Tomáš KarelDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czechia.
David ChudánDepartment of Information and Knowledge Engineering, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czechia.
Stanislav VojířDepartment of Information and Knowledge Engineering, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czechia.
Michal ZavřelInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia.
Ondřej ŠancaInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia.
Ruth TachezyDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science-BIOCEV, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Prague University of Economics and Business · CZMasaryk University · CZCharles University · CZCzech Technical University in Prague · CZInstitute of Health Information and Statistics · CZNational Institute of Public Health · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundThe sensitivity and specificity of selected antigen detection rapid diagnostic tests (AG-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 were determined in the unvaccinated population when the Delta variant was circulating. Viral loads, dynamics, symptoms and tissue tropism differ between Omicron and Delta.AimWe aimed to compare AG-RDT sensitivity and specificity in selected subgroups during Omicron vs Delta circulation.MethodsWe retrospectively paired AG-RDT results with PCRs registered in Czechia's Information System for Infectious Diseases from 1 to 25 December 2021 (Delta, n = 20,121) and 20 January to 24 February 2022 (Omicron, n = 47,104).ResultsWhen confirmatory PCR was conducted on the same day as AG-RDT as a proxy for antigen testing close to peak viral load, the average sensitivity for Delta was 80.4% and for Omicron 81.4% (p < 0.05). Sensitivity in vaccinated individuals was lower for Omicron (OR = 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-1.03), particularly in reinfections (OR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.75-0.92). Saliva AG-RDT sensitivity was below average for both Delta (74.4%) and Omicron (78.4%). Tests on the European Union Category A list had higher sensitivity than tests in Category B. The highest sensitivity for Omicron (88.5%) was recorded for patients with loss of smell or taste, however, these symptoms were almost 10-fold less common than for Delta. The sensitivity of AG-RDTs performed on initially asymptomatic individuals done 1, 2 or 3 days before a positive PCR test was consistently lower for Omicron compared with Delta.ConclusionSensitivity for Omicron was lower in subgroups that may become more common if SARS-CoV-2 becomes an endemic virus.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingCzech RepublicHumansReinfectionRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2deltaomicronrapid antigen testreinfectionSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID37733239
PMCPMC10515498
OpenAlexW4386910969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.