Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733229›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2023

s-CRIq: the online short version of the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire.

Sara Mondini, Veronica Pucci, Massimiliano Pastore, Ombretta Gaggi, Pier Paolo Tricomi, Massimo Nucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara MondiniDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, FISPPA, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. sara.mondini@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-9435
Veronica PucciDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, FISPPA, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Massimiliano PastoreDepartment of Developmental Psychology, DPSS, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Ombretta GaggiHuman Inspired Technology Research Centre, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Pier Paolo TricomiHuman Inspired Technology Research Centre, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Massimo NucciHuman Inspired Technology Research Centre, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe wide use of the term Cognitive Reserve (CR) is in need of a clear and shared definition of its concept and of the development of new tools, quick and easy to use and updated for the people of today. This study describes the online short CRIq (s-CRIq), the new shorter version of the CRIq, following an item analysis revision, and compares the data distribution of different samples.

methodsThe s-CRIq was administered online to 435 people while another 440 filled out the s-CRIq in self-administration. A further 588 participants had been administered the original paper-and-pencil long CRIq and 344 the online long CRIq.

resultsThe major difference in the databases of s-CRIq versus the long versions is an increased score in education and in leisure activity. However, the density distributions of the total score of CRI in the 4 databases share 64% of their areas, and at least two of them share 84%.

conclusionThe s-CRIq proved to be a simple and easy-to-administer tool. Similarly, to the original version, the s-CRIq is freely available on the web, and it is our hope that it will be of fruitful use for researchers and clinicians alike.

Indexed as

Cognitive ReserveEducational StatusHumansLeisure ActivitiesNeuropsychological TestsSurveys and QuestionnairesCognitive ReserveEducationLeisure-timeLifestyleWorking activity

Identifiers

PMID37733229
PMCPMC10721653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.