Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733221›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2024

Deep neural network-estimated age using optical coherence tomography predicts mortality.

Ruiye Chen, Shiran Zhang, Guankai Peng, Wei Meng, Grace Borchert, Wei Wang, Zhen Yu, Huan Liao, Zongyuan Ge, Mingguang He and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Central retinal volume derived from optical coherence tomography as a potential predictor of mortality in the old-aged population- results from the German AugUR study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Novel Foundation Model-Based Framework for Multimodal Retinal Age Prediction.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruiye ChenCentre for Eye Research Australia; Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Shiran ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guankai PengGuangzhou Vision Tech Medical Technology Co., Ltd, GuangZhou, China.
Wei MengGuangzhou Vision Tech Medical Technology Co., Ltd, GuangZhou, China.
Grace BorchertCentre for Eye Research Australia; Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Wei WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhen YuCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Huan LiaoEpigenetics and Neural Plasticity Laboratory, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Zongyuan GeFaculty of IT, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mingguang HeCentre for Eye Research Australia; Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. mingguang.he@unimelb.edu.au.
Zhuoting ZhuCentre for Eye Research Australia; Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. lisa.zhu@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9897-1192
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe University of Melbourne · AUVision Medicals (China) · CNMonash Medical Centre · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology. 303060202400362High-level Talent Flexible Introduction Fund of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital KJ012019530National Natural Science Foundation of China 82000901National Natural Science Foundation of China 82101173NHMRC Investigator Grants 2010072Research Foundation of Medical Science and Technology of Guangdong Province B2021237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of biological age has emerged as a measurement that reflects physiological and functional decline with ageing. Here we aimed to develop a deep neural network (DNN) model that predicts biological age from optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 84,753 high-quality OCT images from 53,159 individuals in the UK Biobank were included, among which 12,631 3D-OCT images from 8,541 participants without any reported medical conditions at baseline were used to develop an age prediction model. For the remaining 44,618 participants, OCT age gap, the difference between the OCT-predicted age and chronological age, was calculated for each participant. Cox regression models assessed the association between OCT age gap and mortality. The DNN model predicted age with a mean absolute error of 3.27 years and showed a strong correlation of 0.85 with chronological age. After a median follow-up of 11.0 years (IQR 10.9-11.1 years), 2,429 deaths (5.44%) were recorded. For each 5-year increase in OCT age gap, there was an 8% increased mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, CI:1.02-1.13, P = 0.004). Compared with an OCT age gap within ± 4 years, OCT age gap less than minus 4 years was associated with a 16% decreased mortality risk (HR = 0.84, CI: 0.75-0.94, P = 0.002) and OCT age gap more than 4 years showed an 18% increased risk of death incidence (HR = 1.18, CI: 1.02-1.37, P = 0.026). OCT imaging could serve as an ageing biomarker to predict biological age with high accuracy and the OCT age gap, defined as the difference between the OCT-predicted age and chronological age, can be used as a marker of the risk of mortality.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerTomography, Optical CoherenceHumansUK BiobankAge gapDeep neural networkMortalityOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID37733221
PMCPMC10828229
OpenAlexW4386910560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.