Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733165›Full record

ArticleDiscover nano2023

A novel N95 respirator with chitosan nanoparticles: mechanical, antiviral, microbiological and cytotoxicity evaluations.

Marcela Guimarães Landim, Marcella Lemos Brettas Carneiro, Graziella Anselmo Joanitti, Carla Tatiana Mota Anflor, David Dobkowski Marinho, José Filipe Bacalhau Rodrigues, Wladymyr Jefferson Bacalhau de Sousa, Daniel de Oliveira Fernandes, Beatriz Ferreira Souza, Alicia Simalie Ombredane and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover nano, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Marcela Guimarães LandimUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Marcella Lemos Brettas CarneiroUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil. marbretas@gmail.com.
Graziella Anselmo JoanittiUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Carla Tatiana Mota AnflorUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
David Dobkowski MarinhoUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
José Filipe Bacalhau RodriguesNortheast Laboratory for Evaluation and Development of Biomaterials (CERTBIO), University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil.
Wladymyr Jefferson Bacalhau de SousaNortheast Laboratory for Evaluation and Development of Biomaterials (CERTBIO), University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil.
Daniel de Oliveira FernandesUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Beatriz Ferreira SouzaUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Alicia Simalie OmbredaneUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Jessica Catarine Frutuoso do NascimentoAggeu Magalhaes Institute (FIOCRUZ), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Gisela de Jesus FeliceUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Aline Midori Adati KubotaUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Juliana Simas Coutinho BarbosaNational Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil.
John Hideki OhnoMCI Ultrasonica LTDA, Av. Campinas, 367 - Arraial Paulista, Taboão da Serra, São Paulo, Brazil.
Solomon Kweku Sagoe AmoahNortheast Laboratory for Evaluation and Development of Biomaterials (CERTBIO), University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil.
Lindomar José PenaAggeu Magalhaes Institute (FIOCRUZ), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Glécia Virgolino da Silva LuzUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Laise Rodrigues de AndradeUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Willie Oliveira PinheiroUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Bergmann Morais RibeiroUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Fábio Rocha FormigaAggeu Magalhaes Institute (FIOCRUZ), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Marcus Vinícius Lia FookNortheast Laboratory for Evaluation and Development of Biomaterials (CERTBIO), University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil.
Mário Fabrício Fleury RosaUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Henry Maia PeixotoUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Rodrigo Luiz CarregaroUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Suélia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury RosaUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 307885/2020-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 403472/2020-2Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 00193-00000736/2021-64
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is known that some sectors of hospitals have high bacteria and virus loads that can remain as aerosols in the air and represent a significant health threat for patients and mainly professionals that work in the place daily. Therefore, the need for a respirator able to improve the filtration barrier of N95 masks and even inactivating airborne virus and bacteria becomes apparent. Such a fact motivated the creation of a new N95 respirator which employs chitosan nanoparticles on its intermediate layer (SN95 + CNP).

resultsThe average chitosan nanoparticle size obtained was 165.20 ± 35.00 nm, with a polydispersity index of 0.36 ± 0.03 and a zeta potential of 47.50 ± 1.70 mV. Mechanical tests demonstrate that the SN95 + CNP respirator is more resistant and meets the safety requisites of aerosol penetration, resistance to breath and flammability, presenting higher potential to filtrate microbial and viral particles when compared to conventional SN95 respirators. Furthermore, biological in vitro tests on bacteria, fungi and mammalian cell lines (HaCat, Vero E6 and CCL-81) corroborate the hypothesis that our SN95 + CNP respirator presents strong antimicrobial activity and is safe for human use. There was a reduction of 96.83% of the alphacoronavirus virus and 99% of H1N1 virus and MHV-3 betacoronavirus after 120 min of contact compared to the conventional respirator (SN95), demonstrating that SN95 + CNP have a relevant potential as personal protection equipment.

conclusionsDue to chitosan nanotechnology, our novel N95 respirator presents improved mechanical, antimicrobial and antiviral characteristics.

Indexed as

AntiviralBiopolymerChitosanCoronavirusFacemaskNanomaterial

Identifiers

PMID37733165
PMCPMC10514013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.