SynthesisInternational journal of implant dentistry2023
Microleakage along the implant-abutment interface: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
Synthesis in International journal of implant dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Internal fit of cobalt-chromium and zirconia implant abutments fabricated using different techniques: a micro-computed tomography study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Quantitative analysis of peri-implant collagen fiber orientation around external hexagon and Morse taper implant connections: A dog model study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- The effect of 3D printing technology combined with Morse taper and platform switching design on microleakage performance of dental implants.Odontology · 2026Article
- Histologic Analysis of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Around External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant Connections.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Marginal fit of titanium and zirconia abutments: Micro-CT analysis.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Tape as a Screw-Access Sealing Material in Implant-Supported Crowns.Cureus · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Effects of Platform Diameter and Screw Length in an Abutment-Free Tissue-Level Implant System Compared with a Ti-Base Configuration: 3D Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Stress Assessment of Abutment-Free and Three Implant-Abutment Connections Utilizing Various Abutment Materials: A 3D Finite Element Study of Static and Cyclic Static Loading Conditions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Utilization of Ultrashort Bicon Implants in Clinical Situations: A Retrospective Case Series.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Efficacy of furanone in reducing the bacterial contamination and marginal bone loss of dental implants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Case Report of a Dental Implant with Conometric Abutment-Prosthetic Cap Connection: Advanced High-Resolution Imaging and Peri-Implant Connective Tissue Performance.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the incidence of microleakage events (IME) and to identify the potential factors influencing the sealing ability of the implant-abutment interface (IAI) under in vitro investigation. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, combined with a manual literature search was conducted up to September 2022. In vitro studies that reported the degree of microleakage at IAI under dynamic loading conditions were included. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean values of the incidence of microleakage events. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to further investigate the effect of different variables.
results675 studies were identified following the search process and 17 in vitro studies were selected according to the eligibility criteria. The weighted mean incidence of microleakage events was 47% (95% confidence interval: [0.33, 0.60]), indicating that contamination was observed in nearly half of the samples. Concerning possible factors that may influence microleakage (e.g., loading condition, assessment method, implant-abutment connection design, types of abutment material, the use of sealing agents), loading condition (p = 0.016) was the only variable that significantly influenced IME in the meta-regression analysis.
conclusionsThe results demonstrated that dynamic loading significantly increases the potential of bacterial penetration at the implant-abutment junction. The results should be interpreted carefully due to the data heterogeneity and further well-conducted in vitro studies with homogeneous samples are needed to standardize the methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.