Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733073›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia2023

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in maintenance of epidural labor analgesia: a literature review.

Fanshu Ni, Ziyi Wu, Ping Zhao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fanshu NiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street Heping District, Shenyang, CN 110004, Liaoning Province, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7505-3121
Ziyi WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street Heping District, Shenyang, CN 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Ping ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street Heping District, Shenyang, CN 110004, Liaoning Province, China. zhaop@sj-hospital.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB), administered by the infusion pump programmed to deliver boluses of epidural solution at certain intervals, is gradually gaining more attention as a technique to maintain the labor analgesia in recent years. Many studies find that it may have some advantages when compared with other methods. However, its exact effectiveness and optimal regimen are still unclear. We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published between January 2010 and June 2022. Of the 263 publications identified, 27 studies were included. The purpose of this review is to discuss the effects of PIEB with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in maintenance of epidural labor analgesia on labor outcomes and elucidate the latest research progress of implementation strategies.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalLabor, ObstetricAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansPregnancySystematic Reviews as TopicAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalEpidural analgesiaLabor outcomeLabor painProgrammed intermittent epidural bolusStrategies

Identifiers

PMID37733073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.