Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733067›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2024

Development and usability of a decision aid to initiate anti-osteoporosis medication treatment in patients visiting the fracture liaison service with a recent fracture.

Lieke Maas, Nele Raskin, Marloes van Onna, Dennis Cornelissen, Sandrine Bours, Trudy van der Weijden, Joop P van den Bergh, Marsha van Oostwaard, Caroline E Wyers, Mickaël Hiligsmann and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A quasi-experimental study about shared decision-making and motivational interviewing on patients with a recent fracture attending Fracture Liaison Services.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent-adherence intervention in fracture liaison services.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lieke MaasDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Lieke.maas@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0032-0712
Nele RaskinDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9564-5087
Marloes van OnnaDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-3119
Dennis CornelissenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3977-580X
Sandrine BoursDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Trudy van der WeijdenDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7469-3781
Joop P van den BerghDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-2232
Marsha van OostwaardDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2643-1592
Caroline E WyersDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7662-3990
Mickaël HiligsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4274-9258
Annelies BoonenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0682-9533
Maastricht University · NLDepartment of Health · TW

Funding

ZonMw research line Rational Pharmacotherapy 848016001.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes the development of a decision aid (DA), aimed at supporting patients in their decision whether to start anti-osteoporosis medication. People with recent fractures or osteoporosis and health professionals were supportive of the DA initiative. An experimental study been started to assess (cost-)effectiveness of the DA. PURPOSE: At fracture liaison services (FLS), patients with a recent fracture ánd osteoporosis or a prevalent vertebral fracture are advised to start anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM). This study describes the development of a decision aid (DA) to support patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) in their decision about whether to start AOM.

methodsThe DA was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). A systematic procedure was chosen including scope, design, prototype development, and alpha testing. A previously developed DA for women with osteoporosis was used as a basis. Furthermore, input from literature searches, the Dutch guideline on management of osteoporosis, and from people with a fracture or osteoporosis was used. The updated DA was evaluated during alpha testing.

resultsThe DA facilitates the decision of patients whether to initiate AOM treatment and provides information on fractures and osteoporosis, general risk factors that increase the likelihood of a subsequent fracture, the role of lifestyle, personalized risk considerations of a subsequent fracture with and without AOM treatment, and AOM options and their characteristics in an option grid. Alpha testing with 15 patients revealed that patient preferences and needs were adequately presented, and several suggestions for improvement (e.g. adding more specific information, simplifying terminology, improving icon use) were accounted for. Participants from the alpha testing recommended use of the DA during outpatient visits.

conclusionProfessionals and persons with osteoporosis were supportive of the proposed DA and its usability. The DA could help in a shared decision-making process between patients and HCPs.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansRisk FactorsDecision aidNurseOsteoporosisPatient preferencesQuality of careShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID37733067
PMCPMC10786983
OpenAlexW4386910157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.