Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37732860›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2022

Coping strategies used by health-care workers during the SARS-COV2 crisis. A real-world analysis.

Bárbara Buch-Vicente, José María Acosta-Rodriguez, María Elena Sanchez-Sanchez, Nerea González-García, LLanira Garcia-Ullan, Javier Ignacio de la Iglesia-Larrad, Ángel Luis Montejo, Carlos Roncero

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Promoting Resilience in Healthcare Workers: A Preventative Mental Health Education Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bárbara Buch-VicenteInstitute of Biomedicine of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Avda Portugal 83, Salamanca 37001, Spain; School of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Spain.
José María Acosta-RodriguezInstitute of Biomedicine of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Avda Portugal 83, Salamanca 37001, Spain. Electronic address: id00586759@usal.es.
María Elena Sanchez-SanchezInstitute of Biomedicine of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Avda Portugal 83, Salamanca 37001, Spain.
Nerea González-GarcíaInstitute of Biomedicine of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Avda Portugal 83, Salamanca 37001, Spain; Department of Statistics, University of Salamanca, Spain.
LLanira Garcia-UllanInstitute of Biomedicine of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Avda Portugal 83, Salamanca 37001, Spain; Psychiatric Service, University of Salamanca Health Care Complex, Salamanca, Spain; Psychiatric Unit, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Spain.
Javier Ignacio de la Iglesia-LarradInstitute of Biomedicine of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Avda Portugal 83, Salamanca 37001, Spain; Psychiatric Service, University of Salamanca Health Care Complex, Salamanca, Spain; Psychiatric Unit, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Spain.
Ángel Luis MontejoInstitute of Biomedicine of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Avda Portugal 83, Salamanca 37001, Spain; Psychiatric Service, University of Salamanca Health Care Complex, Salamanca, Spain; School of Nursing, University of Salamanca, Spain.
Carlos RonceroInstitute of Biomedicine of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Avda Portugal 83, Salamanca 37001, Spain; Psychiatric Service, University of Salamanca Health Care Complex, Salamanca, Spain.
Universidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the main coping strategies used by frontline teams during the first days of the COVID pandemic confinement in Spain. This information could be necessary in order to carry out training programs that allow a better handling of future emergency situations, as well as acting more effectively and with less negative emotional impact. A questionnaire was used to identify different psychological profiles for coping, and in turn, other relevant variables were analyzed. The most used strategies by health professionals were problem solving, desiderative thinking and social support. Emotional expression and social support were used more by women. Significantly different behaviors were found in desiderative thinking (lower in people of 35-50 years old, and social support, higher in people 35 years old). The symptoms most commonly experienced by medical personnel were: sleep disorders, anxiety, tension, depressive symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms and general somatic muscular symptoms. A relationship could be determined between the age/gender of the workers and the participants' overall assessment of their ability to cope with the COVID-19 stress situation they had experienced (men 50 years old and women between 35 and 50 years old, who felt able or very able to cope with the stress caused by the health emergency. However, women <35 years old and >50 years old believed they were able to cope poorly with the circumstances. The advantage of specific training plans in order to help with some stress symptoms could be suggested, aimed at the acquisition of tools based on problem solving, and emotional management in stressful and emergency situations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Medically Unexplained SymptomsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Young AdultRNA, ViralClinical psychopathologyEcologyPsychiatry & mental healthPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37732860
PMCPMC9575550
OpenAlexW4306655043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.