Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37732839›Full record

ReviewJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023

Combining Languages in Bilingual Input: Using Experimental Evidence to Formulate Bilingual Exposure Strategies.

Margarita Kaushanskaya

Abstract readReviewVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Introduction to the Research Symposium on Bilingualism Forum.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Margarita KaushanskayaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0003-0434-1219

Funding

Learning in Two Languages by Bilingual Children With and Without Language ImpairmentR01DC016015 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KAUSHANSKAYA, MARGARITA · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Research Symposium in Communication Sciences and DisordersR13DC003383 · NIDCD · AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSN · PI MARGARET A. ROGERS · 1997 to 2026
$727k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016015NIDCD NIH HHS R13 DC003383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTraditional approaches to studying bilingual language development through bilingual-monolingual comparisons are deeply flawed. They are also insufficient as the evidence base for informing advice to bilingual parents regarding the optimal bilingual exposure strategy and for supporting the formulation of bilingual intervention approaches. The purpose of this review article is to provide an overview of empirical studies that have queried the question of how different types of dual-language input shape learning and language outcomes in bilingual children.

methodWe rely on tightly controlled experimental studies of word learning in Spanish-English bilingual children, where we contrast children's learning in dual-language conditions (defined as distributed exposure and code-switched input) to a single-language condition in a within-subjects design.

resultsWord-learning studies querying the role of distributed exposure indicated that distribution of exposures across Spanish and English reduced children's performance in comparison to English-only exposure. However, this effect was rooted in the abrupt switch from Spanish to English rather than distributed exposure itself. In contrast, an experiment designed to test the role of code-switched context on children's word learning revealed that code-switched context where switches resembled naturalistic code-switching behaviors enhanced learning in Spanish-English bilingual children. Notably, across different studies, children with weaker language skills (developmental language disorder) were no more affected by dual-language input than children with typical language skills.

conclusionsTogether, experimental studies of word learning indicate that bilingual children can effectively learn from dual-language input but that different ways of combining languages in the input to bilingual children can have distinct consequences for learning. Ultimately, word-learning experiments, beyond answering critical questions regarding bilingual learning, can serve as an effective bridge between laboratory-based work and intervention studies whose goal it is to discover the optimal way of combining languages in the input to bilingual children with communication impairments. PRESENTATION VIDEO: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23929515.

Indexed as

Language DisordersMultilingualismChildHumansLanguageLanguage DevelopmentVerbal Learning

Identifiers

PMID37732839
PMCPMC11361785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.