Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37732308›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Enhancing LGMD-based model for collision prediction via binocular structure.

Yi Zheng, Yusi Wang, Guangrong Wu, Haiyang Li, Jigen Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi ZhengSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Yusi WangSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangrong WuSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Haiyang LiSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Jigen PengSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lobular giant motion detector (LGMD) neurons, renowned for their distinctive response to looming stimuli, inspire the development of visual neural network models for collision prediction. However, the existing LGMD-based models could not yet incorporate the invaluable feature of depth distance and still suffer from the following two primary drawbacks. Firstly, they struggle to effectively distinguish the three fundamental motion patterns of approaching, receding, and translating, in contrast to the natural abilities of LGMD neurons. Secondly, due to their reliance on a general determination process employing an activation function and fixed threshold for output, these models exhibit dramatic fluctuations in prediction effectiveness across different scenarios. Methods: To address these issues, we propose a novel LGMD-based model with a binocular structure (Bi-LGMD). The depth distance of the moving object is extracted by calculating the binocular disparity facilitating a clear differentiation of the motion patterns, after obtaining the moving object's contour through the basic components of the LGMD network. In addition, we introduce a self-adaptive warning depth-distance, enhancing the model's robustness in various motion scenarios. Results: The effectiveness of the proposed model is verified using computer-simulated and real-world videos. Discussion: Furthermore, the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model is robust to contrast and noise.

Indexed as

binocular visioncollision predictiondepth distancedisparitylobula giant movement detectors (LGMDs)

Identifiers

PMID37732308
PMCPMC10507862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.