ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Age-related asymmetry in left-right ears of sound lateralization with respect to four different rise times.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population-Level Laterality of Ambush Posture in the Chinese Green Tree Pit Viper (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- The Influence of Sex, Ear, and Age on Auditory Brainstem Responses Recorded with the NeuroAudio System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Event-Related Potentials as Markers of Age-Related Changes of Spatial Hearing in Normal-Hearing Adults.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An experimental investigation was conducted to elucidate the auditory characteristics of the older adult population. The study involved 24 older adult and 24 young participants, with the aim of exploring their horizontal lateralization ability. This was achieved by presenting 1-kHz pure tones to the participants' right and left ears while introducing interaural time differences (ITDs). We examined the impact of four rise times (2, 5, 20, and 50 ms) on the onset of the test sound. The findings revealed that older adult participants exhibited lower levels of lateralization than young participants. Moreover, both older adult and young participants demonstrated diminished recognition of the onset portion as the rise time increased. Of particular significance was the conspicuous presence of a right ear advantage (REA) among young participants as the rise time was extended (statistically significant between the left and right ears at the 1% level, considering an ITD of 0.8 ms and a rise time of 50 ms). In contrast, older adult participants did not exhibit REA, even with a prolonged rise time (not significant at the 5% level at the same condition). These results indicate that the REA is not only present in language, as previously observed, but also extends to a pure tone in young participants. The older adult participants exhibited reduced performance in both left-and right-ear sound recognition. The influence of hearing threshold and preferred ear on sound lateralization performance was minimal. Therefore, it can be inferred that factors other than hearing threshold or preferred ear contribute to the presence of REA in young participants or its decline with age. The central and/or corpus callosum functions may also contribute to this phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.