ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
Universal digital high resolution melt analysis for the diagnosis of bacteremia.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fast and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infection is necessary to inform treatment decisions for septic patients, who face hourly increases in mortality risk. Blood culture remains the gold standard test but typically requires ∼15 hours to detect the presence of a pathogen. Here, we assess the potential for universal digital high-resolution melt (U-dHRM) analysis to accomplish faster broad-based bacterial detection, load quantification, and species-level identification directly from whole blood. Analytical validation studies demonstrated strong agreement between U-dHRM load measurement and quantitative blood culture, indicating that U-dHRM detection is highly specific to intact organisms. In a pilot clinical study of 21 whole blood samples from pediatric patients undergoing simultaneous blood culture testing, U-dHRM achieved 100% concordance when compared with blood culture and 90.5% concordance when compared with clinical adjudication. Moreover, U-dHRM identified the causative pathogen to the species level in all cases where the organism was represented in the melt curve database. These results were achieved with a 1 mL sample input and sample-to-answer time of 6 hrs. Overall, this pilot study suggests that U-dHRM may be a promising method to address the challenges of quickly and accurately diagnosing a bloodstream infection. Universal digital high resolution melt analysis for the diagnosis of bacteremia: April Aralar, Tyler Goshia, Nanda Ramchandar, Shelley M. Lawrence, Aparajita Karmakar, Ankit Sharma, Mridu Sinha, David Pride, Peiting Kuo, Khrissa Lecrone, Megan Chiu, Karen Mestan, Eniko Sajti, Michelle Vanderpool, Sarah Lazar, Melanie Crabtree, Yordanos Tesfai, Stephanie I. Fraley.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.