ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
A Nanopore sequencing-based pharmacogenomic panel to personalize tuberculosis drug dosing.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Rationale: Standardized dosing of anti-tubercular (TB) drugs leads to variable plasma drug levels, which are associated with adverse drug reactions, delayed treatment response, and relapse. Mutations in genes affecting drug metabolism explain considerable interindividual pharmacokinetic variability; however, pharmacogenomic (PGx) assays that predict metabolism of anti-TB drugs have been lacking. Objectives: To develop a Nanopore sequencing panel and validate its performance in active TB patients to personalize treatment dosing. Measurements and Main Results: We developed a Nanopore sequencing panel targeting 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 5 genes affecting the metabolism of isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), linezolid and bedaquiline. For validation, we sequenced DNA samples (n=48) from the 1000 genomes project and compared variant calling accuracy with Illumina genome sequencing. We then sequenced DNA samples from patients with active TB (n=100) from South Africa on a MinION Mk1C and evaluated the relationship between genotypes and pharmacokinetic parameters for INH and RIF. Results: The PGx panel achieved 100% concordance with Illumina sequencing in variant identification for the samples from the 1000 Genomes Project. In the clinical cohort, coverage was >100x for 1498/1500 (99.8%) amplicons across the 100 samples. One third (33%) of participants were identified as slow, 47% were intermediate and 20% were rapid isoniazid acetylators. Isoniazid clearance was significantly impacted by acetylator status (p<0.0001) with median (IQR) clearances of 11.2 L/h (9.3-13.4), 27.2 L/h (22.0-31.7), and 45.1 L/h (34.1-51.1) in slow, intermediate, and rapid acetylators. Rifampin clearance was 17.3% (2.50-29.9) lower in individuals with homozygous Conclusion: Targeted sequencing can enable detection of polymorphisms influencing TB drug metabolism on a low-cost, portable instrument to personalize dosing for TB treatment or prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.