Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37732194›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Spontaneous dynamics of hippocampal place fields in a model of combinatorial competition among stable inputs.

Francesco Savelli

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Francesco SavelliORCID 0000-0002-8588-0865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present computer simulations illustrating how the plastic integration of spatially stable inputs could contribute to the dynamic character of hippocampal spatial representations. In novel environments of slightly larger size than typical apparatus, the emergence of well-defined place fields in real place cells seems to rely on inputs from normally functioning grid cells. Theoretically, the grid-to-place transformation is possible if a place cell is able to respond selectively to a combination of suitably aligned grids. We previously identified the functional characteristics that allow a synaptic plasticity rule to accomplish this selection by synaptic competition during rat foraging behavior. Here, we show that the synaptic competition can outlast the formation of place fields, contributing to their spatial reorganization over time, when the model is run in larger environments and the topographical/modular organization of grid inputs is taken into account. Co-simulated cells that differ only by their randomly assigned grid inputs display different degrees and kinds of spatial reorganization-ranging from place-field remapping to more subtle in-field changes or lapses in firing. The model predicts a greater number of place fields and propensity for remapping in place cells recorded from more septal regions of the hippocampus and/or in larger environments, motivating future experimental standardization across studies and animal models. In sum, spontaneous remapping could arise from rapid synaptic learning involving inputs that are functionally homogeneous, spatially stable, and minimally stochastic. Significance Statement: In both AI and theoretical neuroscience, learning systems often rely on the asymptotic convergence of slow-acting learning rules applied to input spaces that are presumed to be sampled repeatedly, for example over developmental timescales. Place cells of the hippocampus testify to a neural system capable of rapidly encoding cognitive variables-such as the animal's position in space-from limited experience. These internal representations undergo "spontaneous" changes over time, spurring much interest in their cognitive significance and underlying mechanisms. We investigate a model suggesting that some of these changes could be a tradeoff of rapid learning.

Identifiers

PMID37732194
PMCPMC10508775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.