Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37732099›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

The Columbia-suicide severity rating scale: validity and psychometric properties of an online Spanish-language version in a Mexican population sample.

Fernando Austria-Corrales, Alberto Jiménez-Tapia, Claudia Iveth Astudillo-García, Paulina Arenas-Landgrave, Tonatiuh Xochihua-Tlecuitl, Copytzy Cruz-Cruz, Leonor Rivera-Rivera, José Alberto Gómez-García, Bruma Palacios-Hernández, Berenice Pérez-Amezcua and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fernando Austria-CorralesCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Alberto Jiménez-TapiaInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Claudia Iveth Astudillo-GarcíaInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Paulina Arenas-LandgraveFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Tonatiuh Xochihua-TlecuitlFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Copytzy Cruz-CruzServicios de Atención Psiquiátrica (SAP). Secretaría de Salud, Mexico City, Mexico.
Leonor Rivera-RiveraCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
José Alberto Gómez-GarcíaIndependent Researcher, Mexico City, Mexico.
Bruma Palacios-HernándezCentro de Investigación Transdisciplinar en Psicología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Berenice Pérez-AmezcuaCentro de Investigación Transdisciplinar en Psicología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Filiberto Toledano-ToledanoUnidad de Investigación en Medicina Basada en Evidencias, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jenelle RichardsDepartment of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, United States.
Igor GalynkerIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and psychometric properties in a Mexican sample of a Spanish-language online version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Data were collected between May and October 2021 from 3,645 participants aged 18 years and over, who agreed to complete the questionnaire. Reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and psychometric properties were calculated using a two-parameter model. The results showed a reasonable level of reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.814, and evidence of unidimensionality, and construct validity for suicide risk at three risk levels: low, medium, and high. Analysis of the items suggests that they are consistent with the proposed theoretical model. Our results also demonstrate that the parameters are stable and able to efficiently discriminate individuals at high risk of suicide. We propose the use of this version of the C-SSRS in the Spanish-speaking population, since it is a multifactorial assessment of suicide risk and the inclusion of other clinical and risk factor assessments for a more comprehensive evaluation.

Indexed as

SuicideAdolescentAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansLanguagePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsC-SSRSrisk assessmentsuicidal behaviorsuicide riskvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID37732099
PMCPMC10507718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.