Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37732022›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Combined influence of immigration status and income on cervical cancer screening uptake.

Jeanne Sassenou, Virginie Ringa, Marie Zins, Anna Ozguler, Sylvain Paquet, Henri Panjo, Jeanna-Eve Franck, Gwenn Menvielle, Laurent Rigal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Acceptability of Self-Sampling for Cervical Screening in Ethnically Diverse Groups in Northwest England: A Focus Group Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeanne SassenouCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Virginie RingaCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Marie ZinsNational Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Population-based Epidemiologic Cohorts Units, UMS 011, Villejuif, France.
Anna OzgulerNational Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Population-based Epidemiologic Cohorts Units, UMS 011, Villejuif, France.
Sylvain PaquetCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Henri PanjoCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Jeanna-Eve FranckIRIS, Inserm/EHESS/CNRS, Aubervilliers, France.
Gwenn MenvielleSorbonne University, National Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Institut Pierre-Louis Epidémiologie et Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Laurent RigalCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regular performance of Pap tests for cervical cancer screening reduces this disease's incidence and mortality. Income inequalities have been reported for this screening, partly because in some countries women must advance or even pay out-of-pocket costs. Because immigrant status is also associated with low Pap test uptake, we aimed to analyze the combined impact of immigrant status and low income on cervical cancer underscreening. This study, based on the French CONSTANCES cohort, uses data from the cohort questionnaires and linked health insurance fund data about Pap test reimbursement. To measure income inequalities in screening, we calculated a Slope Index of Inequality (SII) by linear regression, taking into account the migration status of participants. The majority of the 70,614 women included in the analysis were not immigrants (80.2%), while 12.9% were second-generation immigrants, and 6.9% first-generation immigrants. The proportion of underscreening increased with immigrant status, from 19.5% among nonimmigrants to 23.6% among the second generation, and 26.5% among the first (

Indexed as

Cervical cancer screeningFranceMigration statusSocial inequalities

Identifiers

PMID37732022
PMCPMC10507147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.