Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731938›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Safety and immunogenicity of multivalent SARS-CoV-2 protein vaccines: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Suad Hannawi, Lixin Yan, Linda Saifeldin, Alaa Abuquta, Ahmad Alamadi, Sally A Mahmoud, Aala Hassan, Miaomiao Zhang, Cuige Gao, Yuanxin Chen and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05323461 (A Randomized, Double-blind, and Positive-controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of SCTV01C), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05323461 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, and Positive-controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of SCTV01C (A Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 Trimeric Spike Protein Vaccine) and SCTV01E (A COVID-19 Alpha/Beta/Delta/Omicron Variants S-Trimer Vaccine) in Population Aged ≥18 Years Previously Vaccinated With Either Inactivated or mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine or Previously Diagnosed With COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinocelltech Ltd.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled1,800ConditionsCOVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 InfectionArmsSCTV01C, SCTV01E, Sinopharm inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Vaccine adjuvants for infectious disease in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Suad HannawiInternal Medicine Department, Al Kuwait-Dubai (ALBaraha) Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Lixin YanBeijing Engineering Research Center of Protein and Antibody, Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China.
Linda SaifeldinGeneral Surgery Department, Al Kuwait-Dubai (ALBaraha) Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Alaa AbuqutaInternal Medicine Department, Al Kuwait-Dubai (ALBaraha) Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Ahmad AlamadiEar, Nose and Throat Department (ENT), Al Kuwait-Dubai (ALBaraha) Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Sally A MahmoudBiogenix Labs, G42 Healthcare, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Aala HassanInternal Medicine Department, Al Kuwait-Dubai (ALBaraha) Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Miaomiao ZhangBeijing Engineering Research Center of Protein and Antibody, Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China.
Cuige GaoBeijing Engineering Research Center of Protein and Antibody, Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yuanxin ChenBeijing Engineering Research Center of Protein and Antibody, Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China.
Wenlin GaiBeijing Engineering Research Center of Protein and Antibody, Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China.
Liangzhi XieBeijing Engineering Research Center of Protein and Antibody, Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 vaccines that offer broad-spectrum protection are needed. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of multivalent vaccines, SCTV01E and SCTV01C, and compare them with an inactivated vaccine. Methods: In the phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05323461), adult participants previously vaccinated with Sinopharm's inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBBIP-CorV) were assigned to receive one booster dose of BBBIP-CorV, 20 μg SCTV01C, or 30 μg SCTV01E. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the geometric mean titers (GMT) of neutralizing antibody (nAb) against the Delta and Omicron BA.1 variants on day 28 after injection. Additional endpoints included GMTs of nAb against Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron BA.1 variants on day 180, GMTs against BA.5 on day 28, as well as solicited adverse events (AEs) within seven days, unsolicited AEs within 28 days, and serious AEs, AEs of special interest within 180 days after vaccination. Findings: Between May 30, 2022 and October 28, 2022, a total of 1351 participants were randomized to BBBIP-CorV, SCTV01C, or SCTV01E in a 1:1:1 ratio, with immunogenicity assessments performed on the first 300 participants. For BBBIP-CorV, SCTV01C, and SCTV01E groups, the day 28 GMTs of neutralizing antibody against Omicron BA.1 were a 2.38-, 19.37-, and 28.06-fold increase from baseline; the GMTs against Omicron BA.5 were 2.07-, 15.89- and 21.11-fold increases; the GMTs against Delta variants were 1.97-, 12.76-, and 15.88-fold increases, respectively. The day 28 geometric mean ratio (GMR) of SCTV01C/BBIBP-CorV for Omicron BA.1 was 6.49 (95% CI: 4.75, 8.88), while the GMR of SCTV01E/BBIBP-CorV was 9.56 (95% CI: 6.85, 13.33). For the Delta variant, the day 28 GMR of SCTV01C/BBIBP-CorV was 6.26 (95% CI: 4.78, 8.19), and the day 28 GMR of SCTV01E/BBIBP-CorV was 7.26 (95% CI: 5.51, 9.56). On Day 180, the GMTs against Omicron BA.1 were 2.80-, 9.51-, and 15.56-fold increase from baseline, while those against Delta were 1.58-, 5.49-, and 6.63-fold for BBBIP-CorV, SCTV01C, and SCTV01E groups, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that SCTV01C and SCTV01E induced uniformly high GMTs against both BA.1 and BA.5, demonstrating its superiority over BBIBP-CorV, regardless of baseline GMT levels. Safety and reactogenicity were similar among the three vaccines. Most AEs were Grade 1 or 2. There were 15 ≥Grade 3 AEs: 6 in the BBIBP-CorV group, 4 in the SCTV01C group and 5 in the SCTV01E group. No SAE was reported and one grade 1 AESI (Bell's palsy) was observed in SCTV01C group. Interpretation: A booster dose of the tetravalent vaccine SCTV01E consistently induced high neutralizing antibody responses against Omicron BA.1, BA.5, and Delta variants, demonstrating superiority over inactivated vaccine. There is evidence to suggest that SCTV01E may have GMT superiority over bivalent vaccine SCTV01C against Delta, BA.1 and BA.5 variants. Funding: This study was sponsored by Sinocelltech Ltd., and funded by the Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project [Z221100007922012] and the National Key Research and Development Program of China [2022YFC0870600].

Indexed as

BoosterImmunogenicitySafetySARS-CoV-2Tetravalent vaccine

Identifiers

PMID37731938
PMCPMC10507195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.