Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731865›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2023

The Cystic Fibrosis Learning Network: A mixed methods evaluation of program goals, attributes, and impact.

Aricca D Van Citters, Madge E Buus-Frank, Joel R King, Michael Seid, Megan M Holthoff, Raouf S Amin, Maria T Britto, Eugene C Nelson, Bruce C Marshall, Kathryn A Sabadosa

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The globalization of cystic fibrosis care.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aricca D Van CittersThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Geisel School of Medicine Lebanon New Hampshire USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-5661
Madge E Buus-FrankThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Geisel School of Medicine Lebanon New Hampshire USA.
Joel R KingThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Geisel School of Medicine Lebanon New Hampshire USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2932-4768
Michael SeidDivision of Pulmonary Medicine Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-9263
Megan M HolthoffThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Geisel School of Medicine Lebanon New Hampshire USA.
Raouf S AminDivision of Pulmonary Medicine Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Maria T BrittoJames M Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati OH USA.
Eugene C NelsonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Geisel School of Medicine Lebanon New Hampshire USA.
Bruce C MarshallCystic Fibrosis Foundation Bethesda Maryland USA.
Kathryn A SabadosaCystic Fibrosis Foundation Bethesda Maryland USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Foundation sponsored the design, pilot testing, and implementation of the CF Learning Network (CFLN) to explore how the Foundation's Care Center Network (CCN) could become a learning health system. Six years after the design, the Foundation commissioned a formative mixed methods evaluation of the CFLN to assess: CFLN participants' understanding of program goals, attributes, and perceptions of current and future impact. Methods: We performed semi-structured interviews with CFLN participants to identify perceived goals, attributes, and impact of the network. Following thematic analyses, we developed and distributed a survey to CFLN members and a matched sample of CCN programs to understand whether the themes were unique to the CFLN. Results: Interviews with 24 CFLN participants were conducted. Interviewees identified the primary CFLN goal as improving outcomes for people living with CF, with secondary goals of providing training in quality improvement (QI), creating a learning community, engaging all stakeholders in improvement, and spreading best practices to the CCN. Project management, use of data, common QI methods, and the learning community were seen as critical to success. Survey responses were collected from 103 CFLN members and 25 CCN members. The data revealed that CFLN respondents were more likely than CCN respondents to connect with other CF programs, routinely use data for QI, and engage patient and family partners in QI. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the CFLN provides value beyond that achieved by the CCN. Key questions remain about whether spread of the CFLN could improve outcomes for more people living with CF.

Indexed as

coproductionlearning networksmixed methods evaluationquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID37731865
PMCPMC10508326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.