Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731822›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

The impact of SARS-Cov-2 infection on the periocular injection pain and hypersensitive reaction to botulinum toxin type A: results from clinical questionnaires.

Xiangyu Liu, Yanli Tian, Chanyuan Jiang, Miao Dong, Ming Li, Hefeng Sun, Xuefeng Han, Facheng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiangyu LiuBody Sculpture and Fat Transplantation Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yanli TianADD+ Medical Esthetic Clinic, Beijing, China.
Chanyuan JiangBody Sculpture and Fat Transplantation Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Miao DongBody Sculpture and Fat Transplantation Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ming LiBody Sculpture and Fat Transplantation Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hefeng SunBody Sculpture and Fat Transplantation Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xuefeng HanBody Sculpture and Fat Transplantation Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Facheng LiBody Sculpture and Fat Transplantation Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about significant changes in the medical field, yet the use of botulinum toxin type A has remained uninterrupted. Plastic surgeons must carefully consider the timing of administering botulinum toxin type A to patients who have recovered from COVID-19. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among patients who had contracted and recovered from SARS-CoV-2 within a month. The survey aimed to investigate various indicators in patients who had received botulinum toxin A injections at the same site before and after their infection, including pain scores and allergic reactions and the occurrence of complications. Results: The pain scores of patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between 14-21 days post-infection exhibited significant variation from previous injections. However, patients who contracted the infection between 22-28 days post-infection did not exhibit significant variation from previous injections. Furthermore, the incidence of allergic reactions and complications following botulinum toxin injection within one month after contracting the infection did not significantly differ from that observed prior to infection. Conclusion: Administering botulinum toxin type A three weeks after COVID-19 recovery is a justifiable and comparatively secure approach.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ACOVID-19HypersensitivityHumansInjections, IntraocularPainPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Botulinum Toxins, Type Aallergic reactionbotulinum toxinCOVID-19hyperalgesiaperiocular wrinkles

Identifiers

PMID37731822
PMCPMC10508337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.