Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731776›Full record

ArticleHealth equity2023

Using Community-Partnered Participatory Research to Value the "Community Lens" and Promote Equity in Community-Academic Partnerships.

Hafifa Siddiq, Felica Jones, Zoe Magnes, Juanita Booker-Vaughns, Angela Young-Brinn, Clarence Williams, Madeline Washington, Etsemaye Agonafer, Olga Solomon, Adrian Oliva and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of Systemic Interventions to Decrease Breast Cancer Risk: A Group Concept Mapping Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hafifa SiddiqCollege of Nursing, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-3186
Felica JonesHealthy African American Families-II, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Zoe MagnesHealthy African American Families-II, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Juanita Booker-VaughnsCommunity Faculty, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Angela Young-BrinnCommunity Faculty, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Clarence WilliamsHealthy African American Families-II, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Madeline WashingtonHealthy African American Families-II, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Etsemaye AgonaferDepartment of Health System Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California, USA.
Olga SolomonUSC UCEDD at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Adrian OlivaHealthy African American Families-II, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3565-8369
Kenneth WellsUCLA Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, California, USA.
MarySue V HeilemannUCLA National Clinician Scholars Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-6076

Funding

The CDU-Clinical Research Education and Career Development ProgramR25MD007610 · NIMHD · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED & SCI · PI Roberto Balbino Vargas · 2012 to 2026
$7.8M
NIMHD NIH HHS R25 MD007610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community input is crucial for identifying characteristics necessary for equitable, sustainable community-academic partnerships (CAPs). A November 2021 conference, honoring the late Dr. Loretta Jones and the Community-Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) model, was held to gather input for designing a learning institute for community members as co-equal partners with academics in research, program, and policy initiatives. This created an opportunity to explore attendees' perspectives on challenges and opportunities related to CAPs with special focus on promoting equity. Methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Five break-out discussion group sessions were conducted in November 2021 co-facilitated by both an academic and a community leader. After consent, discussions were recorded and transcribed. An iterative procedure for collaborative-group-thematic-analysis was developed. The six-phase process included rigorous coding, discussion, comparison of data with data, and development and refinement of themes and subthemes. Results: A total of 38 racial-ethnically diverse participants volunteered from the total conference audience of 62 community and academic partners from various sectors including community-based organizations, health care, social services, academia, or policy within Los Angeles County. Analysis led to development of three themes: Being cautious with the extractive tendency of academia and the need for anti-racism within CAPs; Leveraging community power to resist the top-down lens of academia; and bridging two worlds through an equitably structured table. Discussion: Participants described optimism about the future uses of CPPR to enhance CAPs, and the need to address barriers to equitable partnerships owing to unequal social contexts and entrenched power dynamics. Implications include addressing racism, evaluating financial equity in partnerships to promote accountability, and mentoring community leaders to promote equity. Conclusion: Use of a "community lens" for developing sustainable, equitable CAPs is crucial to promote accountability and to responsibly implement authentic CPPR.

Indexed as

community–academic partnershipscommunity-based participatory researchcommunity engagementcommunity-partnered participatory researchequityhealth equity

Identifiers

PMID37731776
PMCPMC10507929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.