Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Automatic generation of subject-specific finite element models of the spine from magnetic resonance images.

Joeri Kok, Yulia M Shcherbakova, Tom P C Schlösser, Peter R Seevinck, Tijl A van der Velden, René M Castelein, Keita Ito, Bert van Rietbergen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joeri KokDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Yulia M ShcherbakovaImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Tom P C SchlösserDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Peter R SeevinckImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Tijl A van der VeldenImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
René M CasteleinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Keita ItoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Bert van RietbergenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of subject-specific finite element models of the spine is generally a time-consuming process based on computed tomography (CT) images, where scanning exposes subjects to harmful radiation. In this study, a method is presented for the automatic generation of spine finite element models using images from a single magnetic resonance (MR) sequence. The thoracic and lumbar spine of eight adult volunteers was imaged using a 3D multi-echo-gradient-echo sagittal MR sequence. A deep-learning method was used to generate synthetic CT images from the MR images. A pre-trained deep-learning network was used for the automatic segmentation of vertebrae from the synthetic CT images. Another deep-learning network was trained for the automatic segmentation of intervertebral discs from the MR images. The automatic segmentations were validated against manual segmentations for two subjects, one with scoliosis, and another with a spine implant. A template mesh of the spine was registered to the segmentations in three steps using a Bayesian coherent point drift algorithm. First, rigid registration was applied on the complete spine. Second, non-rigid registration was used for the individual discs and vertebrae. Third, the complete spine was non-rigidly registered to the individually registered discs and vertebrae. Comparison of the automatic and manual segmentations led to dice-scores of 0.93-0.96 for all vertebrae and discs. The lowest dice-score was in the disc at the height of the implant where artifacts led to under-segmentation. The mean distance between the morphed meshes and the segmentations was below 1 mm. In conclusion, the presented method can be used to automatically generate accurate subject-specific spine models.

Indexed as

deep-learningintervertebral discmesh morphingpersonalized medicinesynthetic computed tomographyvertebra

Identifiers

PMID37731762
PMCPMC10508183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.