Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731747›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2023

Perception and Experience of Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-Life Study.

Léa Antoine, Eve Puzenat, Dragos Popescu, Romain Charollais, Flora Dresco, Anne-Sophie Dupond, Dominique Salard, Marie-Christine Drobacheff-Thiebaut, Anaïs Zanella, Anne Ducournau and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Léa AntoineDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Eve PuzenatDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Dragos PopescuDepartment of Dermatology, Hôpital Nord Franche Comté, Trevenans, France.
Romain CharollaisDepartment of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier, Vesoul, France.
Flora DrescoDepartment of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier, Vesoul, France.
Anne-Sophie DupondDepartment of Dermatology, Hôpital Nord Franche Comté, Trevenans, France.
Dominique SalardDepartment of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier, Pontarlier, France.
Marie-Christine Drobacheff-ThiebautDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Anaïs ZanellaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Anne DucournauDepartment of Dermatology, Hôpital Nord Franche Comté, Trevenans, France.
Iréne Gallais-SerezalDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besançon, France.
François AubinDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besançon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1421-4996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There are few data on the practical use of dupilumab by the patients and on the patients' experience with this treatment. Objective: The objective of our study was to describe the experience and perception of dupilumab treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study including adult patients with moderate to severe AD treated with dupilumab between January 2017 and December 2021. Clinical characteristics were collected and a questionnaire was sent to all patients. It consisted of different parts including the injection method and different numeric rating scales (NRS) evaluating the patient's satisfaction and the constraints related to the treatment. Results: Eighty-two patients were included and the information was available for 77 patients who responded to the questionnaire. Injection of dupilumab was performed by a nurse in 47% (n=36) of patients and 43% (n=33) were autonomous. Injections were performed by a family member for 7 patients or by the general practitioner (1 patient). A wearing-off of the beneficial effect of dupilumab was reported by 47% of patients leading to shorten the dosing interval. In contrast, dose spacing was reported by 9 patients (11%). After a mean follow-up time of 29.7 ± 10.7 months (median: 27 months), drug survival was 72%. From the patients' perspective, the mean patient's satisfaction NRS score was 7.5 ± 1.8, and the constraints related to the treatment were scored at 3.1 ± 2.1 on NRS. Conclusion: Although AD treatments may contribute to the burden of the disease, dupilumab was associated with a lower burden score, likely reflecting both treatment efficacy and easy of use and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

atopic dermatitisdupilumabexperiencereal life

Identifiers

PMID37731747
PMCPMC10508274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.