ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for NSCLC: superior combination strategies, optimal treatment cycles, and predictive indicators from a Bayesian meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Reshaping immunotherapy sequencing strategy: equivalent survival with induction plus consolidation vs. consolidation-only strategy in unresectable stage III NSCLC.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- Optimizing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycles based on radiologic response improves efficacy and survival in non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
- Is adjuvant immunotherapy necessary after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with resectable stage III NSCLC? A two-center real-world study.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- Induction chemoimmunotherapy may achieve non-inferior outcomes to consolidation immunotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC: a real-world multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Immunotherapy in the perioperative management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: recent developments.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Major pathologic response predicts survival in resectable stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Opportunities and challenges.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2024Review
- Potential predictors of the pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is the optimal choice in the treatment of NSCLC; however, the optimal number of therapeutic cycles remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of neoadjuvant therapeutic cycles in NSCLC. Methods: This study was a real-world clinical analysis that included patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery from January 2020 to August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of therapeutic cycles: 2-cycle group and 3-4-cycles group. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate. Results: A total of 251 patients were included: 150 in the 2-cycle group and 101 in the 3-4-cycles group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. The MPR in the 2-cycle group was 57.3% and not significantly different from that of 57.4% in the 3-4-cycles group (p=0.529). Thirty-two patients (31.7%) in the 3-4-cycles group underwent surgery > 42 days after the final cycle of neoadjuvant therapy, significantly more than the 24 patients (16.0%) in the 2-cycle group (p=0.003). The incidence of adverse events related to neoadjuvant therapy was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle groups (72.3% versus 58.0%, respectively; p=0.021), while the 2-cycle group had a higher rate of postoperative morbidities (28.0% versus 12.9%, respectively; p=0.004). Additionally, for patients with ≤ 44.2% regression in diameter on computed tomography after two cycles of treatment, the MPR rate was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle group (47.3% versus 29.9%, respectively; p=0.048). For cases with programmed death-ligand 1 expression, regarding tumor proportion score ≤ 10%, 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the MPR rate compared with 2 cycles (37.5% versus 9.5%, respectively; p=0.041). Conclusion: Our data support the positive role of chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC. Extending to 3-4 cycles instead of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may improve the safety of surgery and result in a lower incidence of postoperative morbidities; however, the MPR rate may not increase significantly. CT re-evaluation during treatment and PD-L1 expression at initial diagnosis are potential indicators to guide the choice of the number of therapeutic cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.