Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Influence of beam pruning techniques on LET and RBE in proton arc therapy.

Helge Henjum, Johannes Tjelta, Lars Fredrik Fjæra, Sara Pilskog, Camilla H Stokkevåg, Erlend Lyngholm, Andreas H Handeland, Kristian S Ytre-Hauge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helge HenjumDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Johannes TjeltaDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Lars Fredrik FjæraDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sara PilskogDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla H StokkevågDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Erlend LyngholmDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Andreas H HandelandDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kristian S Ytre-HaugeDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Proton arc therapy (PAT) is an emerging treatment modality that holds promise to improve target volume coverage and reduce linear energy transfer (LET) in organs at risk. We aimed to investigate if pruning the highest energy layers in each beam direction could increase the LET in the target and reduce LET in tissue and organs at risk (OAR) surrounding the target volume, thus reducing the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose and sparing healthy tissue. Methods: PAT plans for a germinoma, an ependymoma and a rhabdomyosarcoma patient were created in the Eclipse treatment planning system with a prescribed dose of 54 Gy(RBE) using a constant RBE of 1.1 (RBE Results and discussion: For the germinoma case, all plans but the P6-PAT reduced the mean RBE-weighted dose to the surrounding healthy tissue compared to the PAT plan. The LET was increasingly higher within the PTV for each pruning iteration, where the mean LET from the P6-PAT plan was 1.5

Indexed as

LEToptimizationproton arc therapy (PAT)pruningRBE

Identifiers

PMID37731633
PMCPMC10508957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.