ArticleArthroplasty today2023
Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Ultrayoung.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of a femoral neck fracture combined with ipsilateral femoral head and intertrochanteric fractures: A case report.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Reply to Letter to the Editor: Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Ultrayoung.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- Letter to the Editor on "Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Ultrayoung".Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- In Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty, Is There a Correlation Between Activity Level and Wear of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene?JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures provide a surgical option for "ultrayoung" patients ≤30 years old with end-stage hip arthropathy. This has historically been coupled with concerns over early component failure and challenging surgical technique leading to increased risk of overall morbidity. The purpose of this study is to better elucidate the poorly defined indications and outcomes for THA in ultrayoung patients with end-stage hip disease. Methods: A total of 40 THAs in 35 patients ≤30 years old performed at our institution from 2009 to 2016 were retrospectively followed for an average of 2 years (median 11 months, interquartile range 1-31.25). Primary outcome measure was THA revision. Patient demographics were compared against outcomes. The effects on revision rate of hip joint pathology and type of bearing surface were investigated. T-test, chi-square test, and bivariate correlation were performed to determine statistical significance ( Results: Fifteen male and 25 female patients were included. Median patient age was 23 (interquartile range 19-27) years, with an average body mass index of 27.0 ± 7.9. A majority of THAs were indicated for osteonecrosis (32) and bearing surface type was predominantly metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (36). The overall revision rate was 7.5%, without a correlation between revision and demographic characteristics. Revision surgery was significantly correlated with bearing surface type ( Conclusions: In patients ≤30 years old, THAs performed with the use of modern implants and surgical methods show satisfactory survivorship and functional outcomes with short-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.