Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731548›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine international2023

Prognostic Value of the Average Lung CT Number in Patients with Acute Paraquat Poisoning.

Xinrui Jiang, Hengjun Liu, Geng Lu, Jiawei Zhou, Jun Wang, Binxia Shao, Peng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinrui JiangDepartment of Emergency, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Hengjun LiuDepartment of Emergency, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Geng LuDepartment of Emergency, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jiawei ZhouDepartment of Emergency, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Emergency, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Binxia ShaoDepartment of Emergency, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-5983
Peng XuDepartment of Emergency, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4679-2782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The chest computed tomography (CT) examination is an important clinical examination in the diagnosis and monitoring of paraquat- (PQ-) induced lung injury. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic value of the average lung CT number acquired by quantitative CT techniques in patients with acute paraquat poisoning in the early stages of the disease. Methods: 46 patients who suffered from acute PQ poisoning in the emergency department of the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2015 to June 2020 were enrolled in the present study. The patients were divided into survival group ( Results: The average CT numbers of the middle-lung, lower-lung, and whole lung fields in the nonsurvival group were significantly higher than those of the survival group ( Conclusion: The present study indicated that the average lung CT number could be used to evaluate the relationship between the severity of PQ-induced lung injury and prognosis, especially in the lower-lung field. However, further research is needed to draw a clear conclusion.

Identifiers

PMID37731548
PMCPMC10508996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.