ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
The long-term safety and effectiveness of the loop technique in left ventricular lead dislocation.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Loop Technique in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-established method that improves the clinical symptoms and long-term prognosis of specific heart failure (HF) patients by restoring systolic synchronicity and enhancing myocardial function. However, the high rate of intraoperative and postoperative left ventricular (LV) lead dislocation limits its application to a great extent. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the long-term safety and effectiveness of a new approach named the loop technique for patients who experience repeated intraoperative transvenous LV lead dislocations during CRT. Methods: The current study was a single-centre, prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial. Forty-four HF patients who underwent CRT were included. All patients were followed to death or 3 years. Results: Among 44 HF patients, 36 underwent the traditional operation, and 8 underwent the loop technique due to repeated intraoperative LV lead dislocations. Intergroup comparison revealed no significant differences between the two groups with respect to most preoperative indices, intraoperative pacing and sensing parameters. At the end of the 3-year follow-up, 4 (11.1%) patients in the traditional operation group and 2 (25.0%) patients in the loop technique group had died. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate ( Conclusions: The loop technique is a safe and effective alternative method for patients who experience repeated intraoperative transvenous LV lead dislocations during CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.