Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731468›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2023

Questionnaire Survey of Neurointerventional Simulation Training in the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.

Yuki Ebisudani, Kenji Sugiu, Satoshi Murai, Jun Haruma, Masafumi Hiramatsu, Tomohito Hishikawa, Isao Date

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuki EbisudaniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Kenji SugiuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Satoshi MuraiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Jun HarumaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Masafumi HiramatsuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Tomohito HishikawaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Isao DateDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Simulation training has focused on education and practical training. However, the adoption rate of neurointerventional simulation training in Japan is unknown. Therefore, we sent a questionnaire survey form to consulting specialists from the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) to clarify the actual simulation training situation and compare the differences between university hospitals and general hospitals in Japan. Methods: The questionnaire survey was conducted in 243 neurosurgical training facilities that had JSNET consulting specialists between May 31, 2021 and July 31, 2021. The questionnaire survey forms were distributed by Google Forms. Results: A total of 162 facilities responded to the survey (response rate: 66.7%; 35.2% from university hospitals and 64.8% from general hospitals). The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7%, and it was significantly higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals (64.9% vs. 47.6%, Conclusion: The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7% in the training facilities of JSNET, and it was higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals. Most of the respondents answered that simulation training is an effective tool to improve neurointerventional skills. They also requested the establishment of simulation training programs and simulation tools.

Indexed as

neurointerventionquestionnaire surveysimulation training

Identifiers

PMID37731468
PMCPMC10508991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.