ArticleThe Permanente journal2023
Evaluating COVID-19 Response Within a Tribal Health Care Organization.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHealth care organizations of all types have adapted in response to COVID-19. Responding to the pandemic has varied across organizations and there are few standardized frameworks from which to evaluate an organizational response. This article reports COVID-19 responses by a tribal health care organization using a synthesized evaluation framework that integrated the organizational values and allowed for timely implementation of responses during this COVID-19 public health emergency.
methodsThe authors categorized each COVID-19 response into six domains, including leadership practices, patient engagement, operations management, teamwork and communication, public health, and external partnerships. Responses were analyzed by domain and across time.
resultsCOVID-19 responses included medical alerts, modifying delivery of care, establishing testing and vaccination sites, additional benefits for employees, as well as new processes for communication between employees and senior leadership. COVID-19 responses were most frequently categorized into the operation management domain (80%). Many responses, especially those that considered patients, employees, and the community, also fit other domains. DISCUSSION: Operation management was the most frequent domain because the pandemic emerged rapidly and required swift, agile, action-oriented responses from the tribal health care organization. The majority of COVID-19 responses involved multiple, not single, domains.
conclusionOur evaluation approach captured areas of importance to the tribal health organization and may be pertinent for other indigenous organizations and rural communities. It is especially important to consider tribal perspectives in response to COVID-19 because of the prior history with Western medicine and infectious diseases, and health care limitations experienced due to rurality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.