ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2023
Biomechanical Comparison between Rotational Scarf Osteotomy and Translational Scarf Osteotomy: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combining Static Stance and Dynamic Gait Personalization to Improve the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Finite-Element Models for Hallux Valgus Foot.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes and Risk of First Metatarsal Shortening Between different Hallux Valgus Surgeries: An Asian Perspective.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Finite element analysis of Scarf osteotomy for precise treatment of hallux valgus.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Comparative effects of modified rotary scarf osteotomy and traditional scarf osteotomy in treating moderate to severe hallux valgus: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRotational Scarf osteotomy has its unique advantages in treating hallux valgus, but it also has certain drawbacks. The biomechanical differences between rotational Scarf and translational Scarf osteotomy are not clear evaluates the correction ability and biomechanical difference of two surgical methods for hallux valgus by finite element analysis.
methodsThe computerized tomography data of a hallux valgus patient were selected to establish a finite element model. The standard Scarf osteotomy was simulated based on the model, and the rotation and translation were performed, respectively. The size of the intermetatarsal angle, contact area, distal metatarsal articular angle and the absolute length of the first metatarsal was compared between the two groups. We completed the cartilage, ligament and other tissues on the bone model to establish a full foot model. We analyzed the troughing, plantar aponeurosis tension, plantar soft tissue, and ground stress and also observed the stability of the fracture site by a three-point bending test.
resultsBoth surgical methods may effectively correct the intermetatarsal angle. After rotational osteotomy, the contact area increased, and the length of the first metatarsal bone initially increased and then decreased compared to that in the translational group. Furthermore, rotational Scarf significantly increased the distal metatarsal articular angle. Mechanical analysis showed that the cancellous bone in the contact part of the fracture site in the translation group had greater stress, which was the reason for the occurrence of the troughing. Stress distribution of plantar aponeurosis, plantar soft tissue, and the ground showed no significant difference. The three-point bending test showed that the separation of the broken ends of the rotational Scarf osteotomy model (0.133 mm) was slightly smaller than the translational group (0.147 mm).
conclusionBoth surgical methods can successfully correct intermetatarsal angle (IMA). Compared to traditional translational Scarf osteotomy, rotational Scarf osteotomy is more conducive to postoperative stability and healing, but it also has certain drawbacks. In clinical practice, individualized surgical methods still need to be selected for different types of patients with hallux valgus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.