ArticleJournal of genetics2023
Molecular characterization of
Article in Journal of genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosomal structural abnormalities and tissue-specific mosaicism: insights into false-negative noninvasive prenatal testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Congenital Anomalies in a Neonate With Partial Monosomy of Chromosome 21 q Arm: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- [Ring chromosome 21 syndrome: report of 2 cases].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025Article
- Partial Monosomy 21q Due to De Novo t(15;21)(q26.3;q22.11): A Case Report with Clinical and Molecular Findings.The application of clinical genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ring chromosome 21[r(21)] syndrome is a rare disorder, and mainly occurs as a de novo event. However, a wide variation of the phenotype has been reported in r(21) cases depending on breakpoints, loss of genetic material, and mosaicism of cells with r(21) and monosomy 21, causing copy number alterations. A 29-month-old female was referred to the centre for seizures, developmental delay, microcephaly, hypotonia, deafness, and other congenital abnormalities. Physical examination revealed short stature and multiple facial dysmorphism. She was unable to sit, walk or stand by herself. Cytogenetic study with GTG banding revealed a karyotype of mos 46,XX,r(21)(p11.1q22.12)[70]/45,XX,-21[10]/47,XX,r(21),+r(21)[1]/46,XX[10]. Additionally, molecular cytogenetics refined the breakpoints and characterized the deleted region (RP11-410P24/CHR21: 32849565-33019511) in the clone with the r(21) as ~12-14 Mb contiguous region at 21q22.12 to 21qter. The present study has accurately detected copy number alterations caused by ring chromosome formation. The basis of the UCSC Genome Browser on Human (GRCh38/hg38) analysis suggests hemizygous expression of a deleted critical region of chromosome 21 in ring chromosome cell lines. This is likely to be the underlying cause of the present phenotypes in the patient. Overall, the genotype-phenotypic correlation in r(21) cases remains widely diverse, most likely due to tissue-specific mosaicism of the 45, XX,-21 cell line.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37731249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.