Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37731095›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Different prognostic significance of coronary artery and aortic valve calcium in patients with chest pain.

Marta Marcos-Mangas, Ana Revilla-Orodea, Teresa Sevilla, Esther González-Bartol, Israel Sánchez-Lite, Noelia Urueña-Martínez, Roman Arnold, Itziar Gómez, J Alberto San Román

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta Marcos-MangasServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. martamarcosma@outlook.com.
Ana Revilla-OrodeaServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Teresa SevillaServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Esther González-BartolServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Israel Sánchez-LiteServicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Noelia Urueña-MartínezServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Roman ArnoldServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Itziar GómezServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
J Alberto San RománServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCoronary artery calcification (CorCa) identifies high cardiovascular risk in the general population. In this setting, aortic valve calcification (AoCa) showed contradictory results. Our goal has been to assess the prognostic power of CorCa and AoCa in patients with chest pain who underwent an ECG-gated cardiac multidetector CT (cardiac-MDCT).

methodsA total of 528 patients without previous known coronary artery disease, with chest pain who underwent a cardiac-MDCT multidetector, were retrospectively recruited. The primary endpoint included death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and heart failure.

resultsA total of 61 patients (11.6%) had an event during a mean follow-up of almost 6 years (5.95 ± 2.98). The most frequent event was acute coronary syndrome (6.4%). Total mortality was 4.5%. Patients with CorCa > 0 had more events than those without CorCa (17.3% versus 4.3%; p < 0.001). Likewise, when only patients without AoCa were considered (n = 118), clinical events were more frequent in those with CorCa (12.7% versus 3.6%; p = 0.004). After excluding patients with coronary artery disease, events were more frequent in those with CorCa (12.6% versus 4.3%; p = 0.004). The higher the Agatston score, the more frequent the events. Patients with AoCa  > 0 had more events than those without (16.5% versus 7.3%; p < 0.001), but in patients without CorCa, no difference in events was seen (6.2% versus 3.6%; p = 0.471). A Cox regression analysis showed age, smoking, prior stroke, and CorCa but not AoCa to be independently related to events.

conclusionsIn summary, CorCa, but not AoCa, is related to cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain who undergo a cardiac-MDCT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We show that coronary artery calcification, but not aortic valve calcification, detected in a coronary CT scan is tightly related to cardiovascular events. Although this is a message already shown by other groups in the general population, we do believe that this work is unique because it is restricted to patients with chest pain sent to coronary CT. In other words, our work deals with what we face in our routine everyday practice. KEY POINTS: • The presence and the amount of coronary artery calcification are associated with cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain. • Aortic valve calcification is not associated with cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAortic Valve StenosisCalcinosisCoronary Artery DiseaseStrokeVascular CalcificationAortic ValveCalciumChest PainHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCalciumAortic valve calciumCardiovascular diseaseComputerized tomographyCoronary artery calciumRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37731095
OpenAlexW4386880157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.