ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Assessing the Practical Application of Rheological Properties of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A 1-Year Follow-Up Photographic Analysis.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nonsurgical Temple Volumization with Soft-Tissue Fillers: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Analysis of Filler Spread: Facial Retinacula Play a Prominent Role.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA hyaluronic acid filler is a viscoelastic substance that can be evaluated by rheology. Rheological properties are important for the longevity of the filler, which can be deformed due to the various forces that exist on the face. This study aimed to evaluate the maintenance of the lifting capacity of hyaluronic acid filler injection.
methodsRheological evaluation of five different products was performed on nine patients who had undergone hyaluronic acid filler injection from Jan 18, 2021 to Jan 27, 2022. Photographs from different time points up to 1 year after filler injection were used to determine the maintenance of the lifting effect of the filler injection.
resultsAfter 1 year of follow-up, the filler on the forehead, temple area, nose, chin, nasojugal fold, and mid-cheek groove areas showed good maintenance, while the nasolabial fold slightly improved.
conclusionsAppropriate rheological parameters of hyaluronic acid fillers should be considered before injection into different facial areas. A good choice of filler can result in a good aesthetic effect 1 year after injection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
37731074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.