Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730854›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2023

Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zachary N Weitzner, Jennifer Phan, Meron M Begashaw, Selene S Mak, Marika S Booth, Paul G Shekelle, Melinda Maggard-Gibbons, Mark D Girgis

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Endoscopic sleeve gastrectomyWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Advances and future directions in endoscopic bariatric therapies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  11. Endoscopic bariatrics: Current status and emerging technologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Intragastric balloon adverse events: a comprehensive MAUDE database review.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary N WeitznerDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2494-5151
Jennifer PhanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Meron M BegashawVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, USA.
Selene S MakVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, USA.
Marika S BoothRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, USA.
Paul G ShekelleDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Melinda Maggard-GibbonsDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Mark D GirgisDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. mdgirgis@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · USRAND Corporation · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a major threat to public health and traditional bariatric surgery continues to have low utilization. Endoscopic treatments for obesity have emerged that offer less risk, but questions remain regarding efficacy, durability, and safety. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic bariatric procedures as compared to other existing treatments.

methodsA literature search of Embase, Cochrane Central, and Pubmed was conducted from January 1, 2014 to December 7, 2021, including endoscopic bariatric therapies that were FDA or CE approved at the time of search to non-endoscopic treatments. Thirty-seven studies involving 15,639 patients were included. Primary outcomes included % total body weight loss (%TBWL), % excess body weight loss (%EBWL), and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included quality of life data and differences in hemoglobin A1C levels. Strength of clinical trial and observational data were graded according to the Cochrane methods.

resultsIntragastric balloons achieved greater %TBWL with a range of 7.6-14.1% compared to 3.3-6.7% with lifestyle modification at 6 months, and 7.5-14.0% compared to 3.1-7.9%, respectively, at 12 months. When endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) was compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), ESG had less %TBWL at 4.7-14.4% compared to 18.8-26.5% after LSG at 6 months, and 4.5-18.6% as compared to 28.4-29.3%, respectively, at 12 months. For the AspireAssist, there was greater %TBWL with aspiration therapy compared to lifestyle modification at 12 months, 12.1-18.3% TBWL versus 3.5-5.9% TBWL, respectively. All endoscopic interventions had higher adverse events rates compared to lifestyle modification.

conclusionThis review is the first to evaluate various endoscopic bariatric therapies using only RCTs and observational studies for evaluation of weight loss compared with conservative management, lifestyle modification, and bariatric surgery. Endoscopic therapies result in greater weight loss compared to lifestyle modification, but not as much as bariatric surgery. Endoscopic therapies may be beneficial as an alternative to bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

GastroplastyObesity, MorbidEndoscopyHumansObesityQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeWeight LossAspireAssistBariatric endoscopyEndoscopic sleeve gastrectomyIntragastric balloon

Identifiers

PMID37730854
PMCPMC10615978
OpenAlexW4386881978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.