SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2023
Effects of deep brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lack of neuropsychological effects following short-term subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: a randomised crossover study.BMJ mental health · 2025Trial
- Cognition in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Obstacles and Challenges?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Complications and Ethical Challenges in Neurosurgery for Psychiatric Disorders.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Immediate and long-term electrophysiological biomarkers of antidepressant-like behavioral effects after subanesthetic ketamine and medial prefrontal cortex deep brain stimulation treatment.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Effects on cognitive functioning are unclear since they have been studied in small samples. We aim to estimate the impact of DBS on cognitive functioning in TRD with a systematic review and meta-analyses. After systematically searching PubMed we included 10 studies which compared standardized neuropsychological tests before and after DBS or between active and sham DBS in TRD. Different random-effects meta-analyses were done for different cognitive (sub-)domains and for different follow-up time windows (<6 months, 6-18 months, and >18 months). We found no significant differences in cognitive functioning up to 6 months of DBS. After 6-18 months of DBS small to moderate improvements were found in verbal memory (Hedge's g = 0.22, 95% CI = [0.01-0.43], p = 0.04), visual memory (Hedge's g = 0.37, 95% CI = [0.03-0.71], p = 0.04), attention/psychomotor speed (Hedge's g = 0.26, 95% CI = [0.02-0.50], p = 0.04) and executive functioning (Hedge's g = 0.37, 95% CI = [0.15-0.59], p = 0.001). Not enough studies could be retrieved for a meta-analysis of effects after >18 months of DBS or for the comparison of active and sham DBS. Qualitatively, generally no differences in cognitive functioning between active and sham DBS were found. No cognitive decline was found in this meta-analysis up to 18 months of DBS in patients with TRD. Results even suggest small positive effects of DBS on cognitive functioning in TRD, although this should be interpreted with caution due to lack of controlled data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.