ArticleScientific reports2023
Advancing autologous urothelial micrografting and composite tubular grafts for future single-staged urogenital reconstructions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-staged in vivo co-transplantation of autologous muscular and urothelial micrografts as a composite tissue tube for urogenital reconstruction.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- When will bioprinting become a therapy? Translational and regulatory challenges in urogenital tissue engineering and surgery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Recent advances and future directions in urinary system tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Pre-vascularisation of the acellular bladder matrix using the omentum in a porcine model prior for bladder reconstruction-a step towards clinical application?Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- Autologous micrografting improves regeneration of tissue-engineered urinary conduits in vivo.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urogenital reconstructive surgery can be impeded by lack of tissue. Further developments within the discipline of tissue engineering may be part of a solution to improve clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to design an accessible and easily assembled tubular graft with autologous tissue, which could be constructed and implanted as a single-staged surgical procedure within the premises of an ordinary operating room. The ultimate goals would be to optimize current treatment-options for long-term urinary diversion. Therefore, we evaluated the optimal composition of a collagen-based scaffold with urothelial micrografts in vitro, and followingly implanted the construct in vivo as a bladder conduit. The scaffold was evaluated in relation to cell regeneration, permeability, and biomechanical properties. After establishing an optimized scaffold in vitro, consisting of high-density collagen with submerged autologous micrografts and reinforced with a mesh and stent, the construct was successfully implanted in an in vivo minipig model. The construct assemblance and surgical implantation proved feasible within the timeframe of a routine surgical intervention, and the animal quickly recovered postoperatively. Three weeks post-implantation, the conduit demonstrated good host-integration with a multilayered luminal urothelium. Our findings have encouraged us to support its use in more extensive preclinical large-animal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.