Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730755›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Advancing autologous urothelial micrografting and composite tubular grafts for future single-staged urogenital reconstructions.

Nikolai Juul, Fatemeh Ajalloueian, Oliver Willacy, Clara Ibel Chamorro, Magdalena Fossum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikolai JuulLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-2028
Fatemeh AjalloueianDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Oliver WillacyLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1541-7795
Clara Ibel ChamorroLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Magdalena FossumLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. magdalena.fossum@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urogenital reconstructive surgery can be impeded by lack of tissue. Further developments within the discipline of tissue engineering may be part of a solution to improve clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to design an accessible and easily assembled tubular graft with autologous tissue, which could be constructed and implanted as a single-staged surgical procedure within the premises of an ordinary operating room. The ultimate goals would be to optimize current treatment-options for long-term urinary diversion. Therefore, we evaluated the optimal composition of a collagen-based scaffold with urothelial micrografts in vitro, and followingly implanted the construct in vivo as a bladder conduit. The scaffold was evaluated in relation to cell regeneration, permeability, and biomechanical properties. After establishing an optimized scaffold in vitro, consisting of high-density collagen with submerged autologous micrografts and reinforced with a mesh and stent, the construct was successfully implanted in an in vivo minipig model. The construct assemblance and surgical implantation proved feasible within the timeframe of a routine surgical intervention, and the animal quickly recovered postoperatively. Three weeks post-implantation, the conduit demonstrated good host-integration with a multilayered luminal urothelium. Our findings have encouraged us to support its use in more extensive preclinical large-animal studies.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresUrotheliumAnimalsEmbryo ImplantationSwineSwine, MiniatureUrogenital System

Identifiers

PMID37730755
PMCPMC10511703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.