Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730605›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Inequalities and mental health during the Coronavirus pandemic in the UK: a mixed-methods exploration.

Chiara Lombardo, Lijia Guo, Susan Solomon, David Crepaz-Keay, Shari McDaid, Lucy Thorpe, Steven Martin, Ann John, Alec Morton, Gavin Davidson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chiara Lombardo *Cambridge Public Health Interdisciplinary Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 113, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
Lijia Guo *Cambridge Public Health Interdisciplinary Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 113, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
Susan SolomonMental Health Foundation, Studio 2, 197 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PD, UK.
David Crepaz-KeayMental Health Foundation, Studio 2, 197 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PD, UK.
Shari McDaidMental Health Foundation, Studio 2, 197 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PD, UK.
Lucy ThorpeMental Health Foundation, Studio 2, 197 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PD, UK.
Steven MartinLeicester School of Allied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Gateway House, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.
Ann JohnHealth Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Alec MortonDepartment of Management Science, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, 199 Cathedral Street, Glasgow, G4 0QU, UK.
Gavin DavidsonSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK.
Antonis A KousoulisMental Health Foundation, Studio 2, 197 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PD, UK.
Tine Van Bortel *Cambridge Public Health Interdisciplinary Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 113, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. tine.vanbortel@dmu.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organisation declared the novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a global pandemic on 11th March 2020. Since then, the world has been firmly in its grip. At the time of writing, there were more than 767,972,961 million confirmed cases and over 6,950,655 million deaths. While the main policy focus has been on controlling the virus and ensuring vaccine roll-out and uptake, the population mental health impacts of the pandemic are expected to be long-term, with certain population groups affected more than others.

methodsThe overall objectives of our 'Coronavirus: Mental Health and the Pandemic' study were to explore UK adults' experiences of the Coronavirus pandemic and to gain insights into the mental health impacts, population-level changes over time, current and future mental health needs, and how these can best be addressed. The wider mixed-methods study consisted of repeated cross-sectional surveys and embedded qualitative sub-studies including in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with the wider UK adult population. For this particular inequalities and mental health sub-study, we used mixed methods data from our cross-sectional surveys and we carried out three Focus Group Discussions with a maximum variation sample from across the UK adult population. The discussions covered the broader topic of 'Inequalities and mental health during the Coronavirus pandemic in the UK' and took place online between April and August 2020. Focus Groups transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis in NVIVO. Cross-sectional survey data were analysed using STATA for descriptive statistics.

resultsThree broad main themes emerged, each supporting a number of sub-themes: (1) Impacts of the pandemic; (2) Moving forward: needs and recommendations; (3) Coping mechanisms and resilience. Findings showed that participants described their experiences of the pandemic in relation to its impact on themselves and on different groups of people. Their experiences illustrated how the pandemic and subsequent measures had exacerbated existing inequalities and created new ones, and triggered various emotional responses. Participants also described their coping strategies and what worked and did not work for them, as well as support needs and recommendations for moving forward through, and out of, the pandemic; all of which are valuable learnings to be considered in policy making for improving mental health and for ensuring future preparedness.

conclusionsThe pandemic is taking a long-term toll on the nations' mental health which will continue to have impacts for years to come. It is therefore crucial to learn the vital lessons learned from this pandemic. Specific as well as whole-government policies need to respond to this, address inequalities and the different needs across the life-course and across society, and take a holistic approach to mental health improvement across the UK.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsUnited KingdomAdult populationCoronavirusCovid-19InequalitiesInequityMental healthPandemicSocial determinantsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID37730605
PMCPMC10510114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.