Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730592›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Adoption of community-based strategies for sustainable vector control and prevention.

Elizabeth Pellecer Rivera, Margarita Rivera Arrivillaga, José G Juárez, Sandra M De Urioste-Stone, Elsa Berganza, Pamela Marie Pennington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeting Trypanosoma cruzi with silver and gold-based N-heterocyclic carbene complexes: insights into parasite death and trypanothione reductase interaction.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth Pellecer RiveraCentro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 18 Av. 11-95 Zona 15 VH III, Guatemala City, Guatemala. elizabeth.p.rivera@alumni.uvg.edu.gt.
Margarita Rivera ArrivillagaCentro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 18 Av. 11-95 Zona 15 VH III, Guatemala City, Guatemala. margarita.rivera@alumni.uvg.edu.gt.
José G JuárezCentro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 18 Av. 11-95 Zona 15 VH III, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Sandra M De Urioste-StoneCentro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 18 Av. 11-95 Zona 15 VH III, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Elsa BerganzaÁrea de Salud de Jutiapa, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social, Jutiapa, Guatemala.
Pamela Marie PenningtonCentro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 18 Av. 11-95 Zona 15 VH III, Guatemala City, Guatemala.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement strategies provide tools for sustainable vector-borne disease control. A previous cluster randomized control trial engaged nine intervention communities in seven participatory activities to promote management of the domestic and peri-domestic environment to reduce risk factors for vector-borne Chagas disease. This study aims to assess the adoption of this innovative community-based strategy, which included chickens' management, indoor cleaning practices, and domestic rodent infestation control, using concepts from the Diffusion of Innovations Theory. We used questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to understand perceptions of knowledge gained, intervention adoption level, innovation attributes, and limiting or facilitating factors for adoption. The analysis process focused on five innovation attributes proposed by the Diffusion of Innovations Theory: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. Rodent management was highly adopted by participants, as it had a relative advantage regarding the use of poison and was compatible with local practices. The higher complexity was reduced by offering several types of trapping systems and having practical workshops allowed trialability. Observability was limited because the traps were indoors, but information and traps were shared with neighbors. Chicken management was not as widely adopted due to the higher complexity of the method, and lower compatibility with local practices. Using the concepts proposed by the Diffusion of Innovations Theory helped us to identify the enablers and constraints in the implementation of the Chagas vector control strategy. Based on this experience, community engagement and intersectoral collaboration improve the acceptance and adoption of novel and integrated strategies to improve the prevention and control of neglected diseases.

Indexed as

ChickensIntersectoral CollaborationAnimalsHumansKnowledgeNeglected DiseasesRisk FactorsChagas diseaseCommunity engagementDiffusion of innovationsEnvironmental risk factorsGuatemalaIntegrated vector controlNeglected tropical diseaseTriatoma dimidiataVector-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID37730592
PMCPMC10512496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.