Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730585›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2023

Psychometric properties and normative values of the revised demoralization scale (DS-II) in a representative sample of the German general population.

Markus Ramm, Johanna Jedamzik, Philipp Lenz, Anileeta Poopana, Gereon Heuft, Rupert Conrad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Demoralization in breast cancer survivors.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus Ramm *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. markus.ramm@ukmuenster.de.
Johanna Jedamzik *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Philipp LenzWest German Cancer Center, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Anileeta PoopanaLWL Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Gereon Heuft *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Rupert Conrad *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemoralization is a clinically relevant syndrome in chronic diseases. The demoralization scale (DS-II) was recently developed as an economic screening tool in clinical populations. Main aim of this study was to provide normative data of DS-II scores in the general population.

methodsWe developed a new German version, the DS-II Münster, and tested internal consistency as well as the previously proposed two-factor structure with confirmatory factor analyses. The DS-II was applied in a household survey of the general population. Associations between DS-II scores and age, gender and other sociodemographic variables were explored.

resultsThe final sample consisted of N = 2471 participants (mean age = 49.8 years, range: 18-96; 50.1% men, 49.8% women). The DS-II Münster showed nearly excellent internal consistency. The model fit indices of the two-factor structure were not superior to those of the one-factor model. Mean scores of the DS-II were as follows. Total score: M = 3.76 (SD = 5.56), Meaning and Purpose subscale: M = 1.65 (SD = 2.77), Distress and Coping Ability subscale: M = 2.11 (SD = 3.02). DS-II scores were increased in women with an effect size of Cohen's d = 0.19. An age-related increase was specifically found for the Meaning and Purpose subscale (d = 0.21).

conclusionsThe study provides normative values of the DS-II with respect to age and gender in the general population to facilitate interpretation of DS-II scores in clinical samples. A DS-II total score > 5 is suggested as a cut-off value. The findings further our understanding of significant symptom burden that was previously suggested in young patients with cancer.

Indexed as

DemoralizationAdaptation, PsychologicalFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSyndromeCancerDemoralizationGeneral populationPalliativePsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID37730585
PMCPMC10512641
OpenAlexW4386897295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.