Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730561›Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2023

Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Anja Beno, Monica Bertilsson, Kristina Holmgren, Kristina Glise, Anders Pousette, Karin Segerfelt, Lisa Björk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03022760 (Return to Work Among Patients With Stress Related Mental Disorders - An Intervention in the Swedish Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03022760 nacompletednot on this map

Return to Work Among Patients With Stress Related Mental Disorders - An Intervention in the Swedish Primary Care (PRIMA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2016 to 2020Enrolled132ConditionsStress, Psychological, Burnout, Professional, Adjustment DisordersArmsWork-related measures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anja BenoInstitute of Stress Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Carl Skottsbergs Gata 22B, SE-413 19, Gothenburg, Sweden. anja.paust@vgregion.se.
Monica BertilssonSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kristina HolmgrenDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kristina GliseInstitute of Stress Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Carl Skottsbergs Gata 22B, SE-413 19, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anders PousetteSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karin SegerfeltInstitute of Stress Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Carl Skottsbergs Gata 22B, SE-413 19, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lisa BjörkInstitute of Stress Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Carl Skottsbergs Gata 22B, SE-413 19, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SERegion Västra Götaland · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStress-related disorders have become a major challenge for society and are associated with rising levels of sick leave. The provision of support to facilitate the return to work (RTW) for this patient group is of great importance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a new systematic procedure with collaboration between general practitioners (GPs), rehabilitation coordinators (RCs) and employers could reduce sick leave days for this patient group.

methodEmployed patients with stress-related diagnoses seeking care at primary health care centres (PHCCs) were included in either the intervention group (n = 54), following the systematic intervention procedure, or the control group (n = 58), receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The intervention included a) a training day for participant GPs and RCs, b) a standardised procedure for GPs and RCs to follow after training, c) the opportunity to receive clinical advice from specialist physicians in the research group. Outcome measures for RTW were sick leave days.

resultsThe median number of registered gross sick leave days was lower for the control group at six, 12 and 24 months after inclusion, but the difference was not statistically significant. The control group had significantly fewer net sick leave days at three months (p = 0.03) at six months (p = 0.00) and at 12-months follow-up (p = 0.01). At 24 months, this difference was no longer significant.

conclusionsThe PRIMA intervention, which applied a standardized procedure for employer involvement in the rehabilitation process for patients with stress-related disorders, actually increased time to RTW compared to TAU. However, at 24 months, the benefit of TAU could no longer be confirmed. The study was registered on 16/01/2017 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03022760).

Indexed as

General PractitionersMental DisordersControl GroupsHumansPrimary Health CarePsychophysiologic DisordersReturn to WorkEmployerReturn to workSick leaveStress-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID37730561
PMCPMC10512560
OpenAlexW4386883739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.