Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730540›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2023

Proteomic survey of the DNA damage response in

Tommy F Tashjian, Rilee D Zeinert, Stephen J Eyles, Peter Chien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tommy F TashjianDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst , Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5675-1151
Rilee D ZeinertDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst , Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Stephen J EylesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst , Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter ChienDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst , Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-1478

Funding

Regulated Proteolysisin Bacteria Development and Stress ResponseR35GM130320 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI Peter Chien · 2019 to 2026
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial DNA damage response is a critical, coordinated response to endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage. Response dynamics are dependent on coordinated synthesis and loss of relevant proteins. While much is known about its global transcriptional control, changes in protein abundance that occur upon DNA damage are less well characterized at the system level. Here, we perform a proteome-wide survey of the DNA damage response in

Indexed as

Caulobacter crescentusBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA DamageGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHumansProteomeProteomicsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialProteomeCaulobacterDNA damagedynamicslon proteaseproteolysisproteomics

Identifiers

PMID37730540
PMCPMC10601758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.