ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2023
Probability of Cavitation in a Custom Iron-Based Coupling Medium for Transcranial Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Procedures.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of a Next-Generation Iron Oxide Coupling Medium for Transcranial Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA coupling bath of circulating, chilled, degassed water is essential to safe and precise acoustic transmittance during transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (tMRgFUS) procedures, but the circulating water impairs the critical real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An iron-based coupling medium (IBCM) using iron oxide nanoparticles previously developed by our group increased the relaxivity of the coupling bath such that it appears to be invisible on MRI compared with degassed water. However, the nanoparticles also reduced the pressure threshold for cavitation. To address this concern for prefocal cavitation, our group recently developed an IBCM of electrosterically stabilized and aggregation-resistant poly(methacrylic acid)-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (PMAA-FeOX) with a similar capability to reduce the MR signal of degassed water. This study examines the effect of the PMAA-FeOX IBCM on the cavitation threshold.
methodsIncreasing concentrations of PMAA-FeOX nanoparticles in degassed, deionized water were placed at the focus of two different transducers to assess low and high duty-cycle pulsing parameters which are representative of two modes of focused ultrasound being investigated for tMRgFUS. Passive cavitation detection and high-speed optical imaging were used to measure cavitation threshold pressures.
resultsThe mean cavitation threshold was determined in both cases to be indistinguishable from the degassed water control, between 6-8 MPa for high duty-cycle pulsing (CW) and between 25.5-26.5 MPa for very low duty-cycle pulsing.
conclusionThe findings of this study indicate that an IBCM of PMAA-FeOX nanoparticles is a possible solution to reducing MRI interference from the coupling bath without increasing the risk of prefocal cavitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.