ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2023
Clinical Pathway for Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients Without Conventional Modifiable Risk Factors: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in myocardial infarction and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a comprehensive meta-analysis of number needed to treat, efficacy and safety.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Pooled it
- Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Commentary - genetic susceptibility as a risk enhancer in secondary prevention: Contextualizing the CAD polygenic risk score.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Utility of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I normalized to left ventricular mass in detection of stable coronary artery disease.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Improving Polygenic Risk Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in East Asian Populations.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
- Myocardial Infarction Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors From 2025-2040: Forecast Analysis of Multinational, Population-Based Study.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Risk Without Recognition: Anticipating the Rise of SMuRF-Less Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- How much does eliminating one or two cardiovascular risk factors matter?: Evidence from the Global Cardiovascular Risk Consortium.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating Individual Level Performance of Polygenic Risk Scores Using Early Onset High Genetic Risk Coronary Artery Disease as a Benchmark.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography and Artificial Intelligence-based Plaque Analysis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Obesity trajectories based on the European association for the study diagnostic framework and their associations with cardiovascular disease: evidence from two longitudinal cohorts.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular outcomes with icosapent ethyl by burden of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in REDUCE-IT.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Arterial Thrombosis in Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Case-Based Narrative Review of Current Evidence.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Routine inflammatory indices modify clonal hematopoiesis-related prognostic risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world cohort study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk among women with no standard modifiable risk factors: evaluating the 'SMuRF-less but inflamed'.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Association of Systemic Inflammation Indices With Mortality in Coronary Atherosclerosis Patients With and Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Beclin 1 level combined with Gensini score and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol correlate strongly with multi-vessel disease.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study: Prevalence and Clinical Profile of Metabolic Syndrome Among Middle Eastern, Mainly Jordanians, Cohort Presented with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Observational
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reducing the incidence and prevalence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) is critical to tackling the global burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, a substantial number of individuals develop coronary atherosclerosis despite no SMuRFs. SMuRFless patients presenting with myocardial infarction have been observed to have an unexpected higher early mortality compared to their counterparts with at least 1 SMuRF. Evidence for optimal management of these patients is lacking. We assembled an international, multidisciplinary team to develop an evidence-based clinical pathway for SMuRFless CAD patients. A modified Delphi method was applied. The resulting pathway confirms underlying atherosclerosis and true SMuRFless status, ensures evidence-based secondary prevention, and considers additional tests and interventions for less typical contributors. This dedicated pathway for a previously overlooked CAD population, with an accompanying registry, aims to improve outcomes through enhanced adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention and additional diagnosis of modifiable risk factors observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.