Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730181›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2023

Clinical Proteomics for Solid Organ Tissues.

William S Phipps, Mark R Kilgore, Jacob J Kennedy, Jeffrey R Whiteaker, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Amanda G Paulovich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MR-SPJournal of proteome research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical Proteomics: A Promise Becoming Reality.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William S PhippsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mark R KilgoreDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jacob J KennedyClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jeffrey R WhiteakerClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Andrew N HoofnagleDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA. Electronic address: ahoof@uw.edu.
Amanda G PaulovichClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA. Electronic address: apaulovi@fredhutch.org.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Project 4: Novel reagent development to enable molecular characterizationU19AG065156 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL, MONTINE, THOMAS J · 2020 to 2024
$15.9M
Proteogenomic Studies aimed at understanding ovarian tumor responses to agents targeting the DNA damage response and translating this knowledge into clinical benefitU01CA214114 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BIRRER, MICHAEL, PAULOVICH, AMANDA G · 2017 to 2021
$8.4M
Clinical translation of a NexGen platform for quantifying protein networks in human biospecimensR01CA235575 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI AMANDA G PAULOVICH · 2019 to 2026
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235575NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214114NIA NIH HHS U19 AG065156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of biopsied solid organ tissue has long relied on visual examination using a microscope. Immunohistochemistry is critical in this process, labeling and detecting cell lineage markers and therapeutic targets. However, while the practice of immunohistochemistry has reshaped diagnostic pathology and facilitated improvements in cancer treatment, it has also been subject to pervasive challenges with respect to standardization and reproducibility. Efforts are ongoing to improve immunohistochemistry, but for some applications, the benefit of such initiatives could be impeded by its reliance on monospecific antibody-protein reagents and limited multiplexing capacity. This perspective surveys the relevant challenges facing traditional immunohistochemistry and describes how mass spectrometry, particularly liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, could help alleviate problems. In particular, targeted mass spectrometry assays could facilitate measurements of individual proteins or analyte panels, using internal standards for more robust quantification and improved interlaboratory reproducibility. Meanwhile, untargeted mass spectrometry, showcased to date clinically in the form of amyloid typing, is inherently multiplexed, facilitating the detection and crude quantification of 100s to 1000s of proteins in a single analysis. Further, data-independent acquisition has yet to be applied in clinical practice, but offers particular strengths that could appeal to clinical users. Finally, we discuss the guidance that is needed to facilitate broader utilization in clinical environments and achieve standardization.

Indexed as

ProteinsProteomicsAntibodiesMass SpectrometryReproducibility of ResultsAntibodiesProteinsclinical proteomicsimmunohistochemistrymass spectrometrypathologystandardizationtargeted proteomicstissue analysisuntargeted proteomics

Identifiers

PMID37730181
PMCPMC10692389
OpenAlexW4386851215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.