Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37729475›Full record

ArticleBiomacromolecules2023

Assessment of the Alga

Karl Mihhels, Neptun Yousefi, Jaanika Blomster, Iina Solala, Laleh Solhi, Eero Kontturi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomacromolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karl MihhelsDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto-University, School of Chemical Engineering, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Neptun YousefiDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto-University, School of Chemical Engineering, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Jaanika BlomsterEcosystems and Environment Research Program, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Iina SolalaDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto-University, School of Chemical Engineering, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Laleh SolhiDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto-University, School of Chemical Engineering, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8625-9982
Eero KontturiDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto-University, School of Chemical Engineering, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1690-5288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanocellulose is isolated from cellulosic fibers and exhibits many properties that macroscale cellulose lacks. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are a subcategory of nanocellulose made of stiff, rodlike, and highly crystalline nanoparticles. Algae of the order Cladophorales are the source of the longest cellulosic nanocrystals, but manufacturing these CNCs is not well-studied. So far, most publications have focused on the applications of this material, with the basic manufacturing parameters and material properties receiving little attention. In this article, we investigate the entirety of the current manufacturing process from raw algal biomass (

Indexed as

CelluloseNanoparticlesHydrolysisCellulose

Identifiers

PMID37729475
PMCPMC10646933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.