Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37729423›Full record

ArticleScience robotics2023

Using robotics to move a neurosurgeon's hands to the tip of their endoscope.

Karl Price, Joseph Peine, Margherita Mencattelli, Yash Chitalia, David Pu, Thomas Looi, Scellig Stone, James Drake, Pierre E Dupont

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science robotics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Few-Shot Physics-Informed Neural Network for Shape Reconstruction of Concentric-Tube Robots.IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation : ICRA : [proceedings]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karl PriceDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5389-4146
Joseph PeineDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Margherita MencattelliDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4697-8923
Yash ChitaliaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6291-3492
David PuDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Thomas LooiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G1X8, Canada.
Scellig StoneDepartment of Neurosurgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4546-6790
James DrakeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G1X8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-9025
Pierre E DupontDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7294-640X
Boston Children's Hospital · USHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

Improving the Safety and Efficacy of Intraventricular Neurosurgery via RoboticsR01NS099207 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI DUPONT, PIERRE E · 2017 to 2020
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major advantage of surgical robots is that they can reduce the invasiveness of a procedure by enabling the clinician to manipulate tools as they would in open surgery but through small incisions in the body. Neurosurgery has yet to benefit from this advantage. Although clinical robots are available for the least invasive neurosurgical procedures, such as guiding electrode insertion, the most invasive brain surgeries, such as tumor resection, are still performed as open manual procedures. To investigate whether robotics could reduce the invasiveness of major brain surgeries while still providing the manipulation capabilities of open surgery, we created a two-armed joystick-controlled endoscopic robot. To evaluate the efficacy of this robot, we developed a set of neurosurgical skill tasks patterned after the steps of brain tumor resection. We also created a patient-derived brain model for pineal tumors, which are located in the center of the brain and are normally removed by open surgery. In comparison, testing with existing manual endoscopic instrumentation, we found that the robot provided access to a much larger working volume at the trocar tip and enabled bimanual tasks without compression of brain tissue adjacent to the trocar. Furthermore, many tasks could be completed faster with the robot. These results suggest that robotics has the potential to substantially reduce the invasiveness of brain surgery by enabling certain procedures currently performed as open surgery to be converted to endoscopic interventions.

Indexed as

RoboticsEndoscopesHandHumansNeurosurgeonsUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID37729423
PMCPMC10801784
OpenAlexW4386883629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.